Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/4607/2023 of DAVULURI JADSON Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 28 June 2026
reserved for orders : ------ Date of pronouncement : 29.06.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010092482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT
Date of reserved for orders
: ------
Date of pronouncement
: 29.06.2026
Date of uploading
: 02.07.2026
APHC010092482023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.4607 OF 2023
Between:
1. DAVULURI JADSON, S/O. D.G. SUNDARAM, AGED ABOUT
41 YEARS, OCC. CARE TAKER, SR BOYS HOSTEL, GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE (RIMS), ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY IT'S
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. MEDICAL AND
HEALTH
FAMILY
WELFARE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT MEDICAL COLLEGE
(RIMS), ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or directions more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent without conducting proper enquiry and without giving any opportunity orally terminated the petitioner from service as Care Taker from 24.06.2022 as highly
illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and violation of Principles of Natural Justices apart from violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Care Taker with all consequential benefits.
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service as Care Taker.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T S N SUDHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV
The Court made the following
JS,J
W.P. No.4607/2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri T.S.N. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that, pursuant to the interim order, dated 27.03.2023, the petitioner was reinstated into service and no further orders are required in this Writ Petition.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is closed making the aforesaid interim order, dated 27.03.2023, absolute. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:29.06.2026 DSH
Whether the order is: Speaking √ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-Reportable √