Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/5351/2023 of BHIMAVARAPU GIRIDHAR KUMAR REDDY Vs ANURAG JAIN,I.A.S on 24 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : 02.07.2026 APHC010490162023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026

Date of uploading : 02.07.2026

APHC010490162023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5351/2023

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. BHIMAVARAPU GIRIDHAR KUMAR REDDY, S/O KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/O H.NO.59-7-7, RAMACHANDRA NAGAR VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT (NOW, NTR DISTRICT), ANDHRA PRADESH 520 008

...PETITIONER AND

1. ANURAG JAIN I A S, AGED MAJOR, OCC SECRETARY, THE DEPARTMENT OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS UNION OF INDIA, ROOM NO.501, TRANSPORT BHAVAN NO.1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI- 110 001

2. SRI SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV I A S, AGED MAJOR, OCC CHAIRPERSON/CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ROOM NO.501, TRANSPORT BHAVAN NO.1, PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW DELHI - 110 001

3. SRI D V NARAYANA REDDY, AGED MAJOR, OCC PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA 21, GURU NANAK COLONY ROAD OPP.LAKSHMI VILAS BANK, TEACHERS' COLONY GURU NANAK COLONY, VIJAYAWADA ANDHRA PRADESH 520 007

4. DR APARAJITA SINGH SINSINWAR I A S, AGED- MAJOR, OCC THE COMPETANT AUTHORTIY, LAND ACQUISITON -CUM-JOINT

COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon and punish the respondents/contemnors for their willful disobedience and defiance to the orders dated 16-03-2023 passed in W.P No.10795 of 2019 by his Lordship Hon'ble Justice Sri Ravi Cheemalapati, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. .

2. The Court made the following order:

This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of orders dated 16.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.10795/2019.

2. Sri G.Rajeswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, pursuant to filing of this contempt case, the respondent authorities have passed orders on the petitioner’s representation and the petitioner wants to question the said order, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt case.

Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 25.06.2026 BRS

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead