WP/19850/2017 of M. Radha Naidu, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, on 24 June 2026

1. M. RADHA NAIDU,, S/O. NARAPPA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC: RETD. EMPLOYEE AND RESIDENT OF VAMPALLI VILLAGE, POLI POST, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS SECRETARY, INFORMATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT..

2. THE STATE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, A.P. INFORMATION COMMISSION, SAMACHARA HAKKULA BHAVAN, DOOR NO. 5-4-399, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, MUKRAMJAHI MARKET, HYDERABAD. 500 001

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT,

4. THE JOINTCOLLECTOR FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY, ( UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT ), 0/0. DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

5. THE DISTRICT REVENUE OFFICER PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, ( UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT ),

NJS,J W.P No.19850 of 2017 CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus, Declare the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in not implementing the orders of the 2nd respondent vide Enquiry No.: 1455/LICLTK/2016, dated 31-8-2016 and also not considering the representation of the Petitioner dated 13-02- 2017 by furnishing the required information is arbitrary, unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 to furnish the required information immediately by complying with the orders of the 2nd respondent vide Enquiry No.: 1455/LIC-LTK/2016, dated 31-8-2016 and to pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 24256 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to furnish the required information to the Petitioner immediately by complying with the orders of the 2nd respondent vide Enquiry No.: 1455/LIC-LTK/2016, dated 31-8-

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. GP FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING (AP)

3. E RAMULU (SC FOR AP INF. COM.) The Court made the following:

NJS,J W.P No.19850 of 2017 The Court made the following Order:

1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner appearing online submitted that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous.

2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.

3. No order as to costs.

4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

Date: 25.06.2026

CM✓/PS/APS – chs Whether the order is: Speaking ✔ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ✔

NJS,J W.P No.19850 of 2017 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

WRIT PETITION No.19850 of 2017 Dated:25.06.2026

chs