Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2033/2016 of M S KUMARI, W.G.DIST Vs ASSN FOR PROMOTING SPIRITUAL & SOCIO, RJY, E.G.DIST & 9 OTRS on 24 June 2026
for orders Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010767512016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2033/2016 Between: 1. MULLAPUDI SAROJA YEARS,OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O.TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement
: 25.06.2026
Date of uploading
: 30.06.2026
APHC010767512016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. M S KUMARI, W.G.DIST, W/O.RAJA RAO, AGE:57 YEARS,OCC: HOUSE
WIFE, R/O.TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. ASSN FOR PROMOTING SPIRITUAL SOCIO RJY E G DIST 9 OTRS, SOCIO ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, REGD. NO.571/84, REPRESENTED BY
ITS ALLEGED PRESIDENT NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, S/O.LATE SEETAPATHI, HINDU, AGED 40 YEARS, T-3, FLAT NO.403, SRI
SAIBABA RESIDENCY, TILAK ROAD, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRIT.
2. KAMBAMPATI KOTESWATA RAO, S/0.MURAHARI RAO, AGED:64
YEARS, R/O.JAGANNADHAPURAM, NOWABPALEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, S/O.LATE SEETAPATHI, PRESIDENT OF ASSOCIATION FOR PROMOTING SPIRITUAL & SOCIO
ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, R/O. OPP: GYM, BESIDE KARNATAKA BANK, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY.
4. ANISETTI VENKATA CHALAM, S/O.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED:50 YEARS, BUSINESS, C/O.NARAPAREDDY VENKATA
PRATAP KUMAR, R/O. OPP: GYM, BESIDE KARNATAKA BANK, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY.
5. VALLEPALLI SREERAMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O.BAPANNA, HINDU, AGED:60 YEARS, C/O.NARAPAREDDY VENKATA PRATAP KUMAR, R/O.
OPP: GYM, BESIDE KARNATAKA BANK, DANAVAIPET, RAJAHMUNDRY
6. DINDI BHASKAR SRINIVAS, S/O.RAMAKRISHNA NARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.0-17, JAMPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY.
7. YARRA NAGABABU, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42
YEARS, R/O.D.NO.2-2-9, JAMPETA , RAJAHMUNDRY.
8. SAGIREDDY VENKATA CHALAMA REDDY, S/O.SUBBA REDDY, HINDU, AGE:
YEARS,
R/O.UPPALAPADU
VILLAGE,
NARASARAOPET
MANDAL.
9. VENKATESWARA
CO
RAJAHMUNDRY,
REP.
BY
K.B.KRISHNA,
S/O.SURYA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.24-14-3/1, R.V.NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY
10. KOUNDINYA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY &
CORRESPONDENT KALIDINDI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA
RAJU, S/O.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, HINDU, AGED:52 YEARS, CHAITANYA
NAGAR,
VELUGUBANDA
VILLAGE,
RAJANAGARAM
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to against the Judgment in I.A.No.1554/2014 in O.S.No.1291/2006, dt.3-8-2015 on the file of I Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 2613 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS No.1291/2006 on the file of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge Rajahmundry, East Godavari District in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKAT CHALLA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. MANDA ADAM
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. This Civil Revision Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred by the petitioner/plaintiff, assailing the order dated 03.08.2015 passed by the learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, (for short, ‘the Trial Court’), in I.A.No.1554 of 2014 in O.S.No.1291 of 2006. By the impugned order, the Trial Court dismissed the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner Under Order IV Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Rule 28 of the Civil Rules of Practice, seeking amendment of plaint and consequential reliefs.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the main suit in O.S.No.1291 of 2006 itself was dismissed by the Trial Court on 01.11.2024. He further contends that, in view of the dismissal of the main suit, the present Civil Revision Petition directed against the interlocutory order no longer survives for independent adjudication and has, therefore, become infructuous.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date: 25.06.2026 SAK Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes
Date: 25.06.2026
SAK