Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/252/2023 of IN RE... Vs SRI .S.A.KAREEM on 24 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010022232023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CONTEMPT CASE NO: 252/2023 Between: 1.

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010022232023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 252/2023

Between:

1.

IN RE..., M

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI S A KAREEM, The Executive Engineer, APCPDCL, Chimakurthy, Prakasam District.

...CONTEMNOR

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to For the reasons stated in the petition, the Hon'ble Court directed the Registry to initiate Contempt proceedings against Sri.

S.A.Kareem, Executive Engineer, APCPDCL, Chilamakurthy, Prakasam District, under the Contempt of Courts Act and register a separate case for willfully and deliberately violating the order dated 03.01.2023 passed in W.P.No.40554 of 2022.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 252 OF 2023

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Mr Naidu Siva Rama Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner in C.C.No.6688 of 2022 on instructions would submit that the order of this Court is complied with. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the attitude of the respondent is not in accordance with law. When respondent appeared before this Court personally he tendered his unconditional apology.

2. Considering the same, taking a lenient view towards the respondent, this Court intends to close the Contempt Case with a warning to the respondent to be more cautious and careful in implementing the orders of this Court in true letter and spirit.

3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the Contempt Case shall stand closed.

_____________________________

JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND 25.06.2026 Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No

Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No TM

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 252/2023

25.06.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead