CRP/2109/2016 of TRIPURAMALLU ANIL KUMAR & ANOTHER Vs CHALASANI KOTI RAVI KIRAN & ANOTHER on 24 June 2026

1. TRIPURAMALLU ANIL KUMAR & ANOTHER, S/O VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED 46 YEARS, R/O MOGALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-10

2. N. SIVA PRASAD, S/O LATE LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED

YEARS, R/O KAMAKOTI NAGAR, VIDYADHARAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-12

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. CHALASANI KOTI RAVI KIRAN ANOTHER, S/O LATE PAPA RAO, AGED

YEARS R/O D.NO.62-2-23, PATAMATA LANKA, VIJAYAWADA.

2. M/S VIJAYAWADA SHARE BROKERS LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, P.SURENDRA KUMAR, S/O JANARDHANA RAO, AGED 56 YEARS, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT D.NO.32-9-1, 1ST FLOOR, RAJDEEP HOSPITAL COMPOUND, MOGALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA-10

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by setting aside the order and decreetal order dated 12-02-2016 passed in I.A.No.33/ of 2013 in O.S.No.138 of 2006 on the file of Hon'ble XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 2704 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.138 of 2006 on the file of Hon'ble XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay afresh in terms of the order made in I.A.No.1 of 2016 (CRPMP.No.2704 of 2016) in CRP.No.2109 of 2016 dated 22.04.2016 and extended from time to time, until further orders and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. V V L N SARMA The Court made the following:

The Court made the following ORDER:

1. This Civil Revision Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is preferred by the petitioner/respondents No.1 and 2, against the order dated 12.02.2016 passed by the learned XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, (for short, ‘the Trial Court’), in I.A.No.337 of 2013 in O.S.No.138 of 2006. By the said order, the Trial Court allowed the interlocutory application and ordered the impleadment of the proposed party as the 2nd defendant in the suit.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the disputes between the parties have been amicably settled out of court. It is further submitted that, in view of the said settlement, the petitioners are not inclined to prosecute the present Civil Revision Petition and have reported that no further adjudication is required in the matter.

3. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that nothing survives for adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.

4. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Date: 25.06.2026 SAK

Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/ Reasoned No Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2109/2016

Date: 25.06.2026

SAK