Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2003/2021 of SHAIK NAZIRUDDIN Vs U.USHA RANI on 24 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No: 2003 of 2021 Between: 1. SHAIK NAZIRUDDIN, S/o.LATE SK. KHASUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC-BUSINESS, R/o.MARKAPURAM, MARKAPURAM MANDAL,
APHC010464102021
IN THE H
(
THURSDA
THE HONOURAB
CONTE
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SHAIK NAZIRUDDIN, YEARS, OCC-BUSI MANDAL, ONGOLE, AT H.No.2-1, GOWT 500050.
1. U USHA RANI, PRINC SECRETARIAT, VELA
2. PRAVEEN KUMAR, DISTRICT, ONGOLE.
3. SMT K LAKSHMI SIV MARKAPURAM, PRA
4. D ELISHA, THASILDA
5. K SHIVA SHANKA MANDAL, MARKAPUR
Counsel for the Petitioner
1. Mr.I LAXMIKANTHA R Counsel for the Contemno
1. Mr.P SUBASH
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY EMPT CASE No: 2003 of 2021 S/o.LATE SK. KHASUMAIAH, AGED A INESS, R/o.MARKAPURAM, MARK PRAKASAM DISTRICT. PRESENTLY R TAMINAGAR, CHANDANAGAR, HYD ...PE AND CIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPA AGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIS I.A.S., DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PR VA JYOTHI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL AKASAM DISTRICT. AR, MARKAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTR AR, MANDAL SURVEYOR, MARK RAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...CONTE r: RAO or(S):
YA ABOUT 55 KAPURAM RESIDING DERABAD- TITIONER ARTMENT, STRICT. RAKASAM OFFICER, RICT. KAPURAM MNOR(S):
The Court made the following order:
On 18.06.2026, this Court passed the following order:
“The learned counsel for the petitioner is not available. It is represented on behalf of the respondents that the orders passed by this Court have been complied with. List the matter on 25.06.2026 under the caption “For Orders”. Though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for orders’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even today also. It appears that in view of the compliance of orders as reported by the learned counsel representing the respondents, the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the Contempt Case. In the said circumstances, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date: 25.06.2026 BLV
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
C.C.No.2003 of 2021 Dt: 25.06.2026
BLV