Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7648/2019 of M/ s. Vigneswara Agritech, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 23 June 2026
reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement : 24-06-2026 Date of uploading : 04-07-2026 APHC010177732019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE
Date of reserved for orders
: -----------
Date of pronouncement
: 24-06-2026
Date of uploading
: 04-07-2026
APHC010177732019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. M/ S. VIGNESWARA AGRITECH,, (REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP
FIRM) REP. BY ITS PARTNER, P. SIVA RAMA PRASAD, S/O.
VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SHED NO.F12, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, KALLUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
AGRICULTURE,
A.P.
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA
PRADESH.
2. COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR
OF
AGRICULTURE,
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR.
3. JOINT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH AT KURNOOL.
4. SEED INSPECTOR/ MANDAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, KURNOOL
AREA, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
5. ASSISTANT
DIRECTOR
AGRICULTURE,
GOVERNMENT
OF
ANDHRA PRADESH, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
6. REGIONAL
VIGILANCE
AND
ENFORCEMENT
OFFICER,
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the action of the respondents in putting lock and key and denying access to godown of the petitioner at Shed No.12, 13, Industrial Estate, Kalluru village and Mandal, Kurnool District without service of any proceeding/case against the petitioner is patently arbitrary and illegal and direct the respondents not to interfere wi the business activity of the petitioner i.e. sale of Sri Bhagya 555, Srirama 999 and bulk stock in the godown without following the procedure of law and grant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to forthwith open the lock and key which are put on the godown of the petitioner at Shed No.12, 13, Industrail Estate, Kalluru village and Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P SRI HARSHA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)
2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal” today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The proceeding sheet dated 17.06.2026, would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Ms.M.Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture for the respondents is in attendance.
3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.06.2026. UPS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
Dt.24.06.2026
UPS