Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/326/2010 of NIMMAKAYALA RAMA SWAMY NAIDU, KRISHNA DIST. Vs GORU DHANALAKSHMI, KRISHNA DIST. on 23 June 2026
Date of pronouncement :24.06.2026 Date of uploading : 06.07.2026 APHC010180362010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
Neutral Citation:__________
Date of pronouncement
:24.06.2026
Date of uploading
: 06.07.2026
APHC010180362010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NIMMAKAYALA RAMA SWAMY NAIDU, KRISHNA DIST., S/O SATYANARAYANA R/O MADHAVAPURAM COLONY, KANURU PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...APPELLANT AND
1. GORU DHANALAKSHMI KRISHNA DIST, W/o Nimmakayala Rama Swamy Naidu R/o Madhavapuam Colony, Kanuru Penamaluru Mandal, Krishna District.
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 740 OF 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Docket order dt. 20-12-2010 in OP No. 378 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble Judge, Family Court at Vijayawada pending disposal of the above appeal in this Hon'ble Court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2010(FCAMP 741 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the SHO Suryaraopet PS, Vijayawada not to arrest the petitoner in Crime No. 378 of 2010 pending on its file pending disposal of the above appeal in this Hon'ble Cout and pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
This Court made the following JUDGMENT ((Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH) Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the appeal does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the appeal becomes infructuous.
2. In view of the above, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the appeal shall stand closed.
_____________ D. RAMESH, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt:24.06 .2026 krk Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable
Dt:24.06 .2026 krk