Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3254/2023 of K THYAGARAJU Vs A AMARANADH on 23 June 2026
reserved for orders Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010286642023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3254/2023 Between: 1. K THYAGARAJU, S/O LATE
Date of reserved for orders
Date of pronouncement
Date of uploading
APHC010286642023
IN TH
WEDNESDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
CO
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K THYAGARAJU, S YEARS OCC AGRIC
2. K VENKATRAMAIA AGED ABOUT 78 YERRAVARAPALLE DISTRICT.
1. A AMARANADH, M YERRAVARIPALLE
2. J VENKATASIVA IRRIGATION DEPA DISTRICT.
3. VENKATRAMIREDD CHITTOOR(TIRUPA
4. V DASTAGIRIAH
Neutral Citation:____ s : : 24-06-2026 : 29-06-2026 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF J O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL NTEMPT CASE NO: 3254/2023 S/O LATE REDAPPPA REDDY, AG CULTURIST ALI CHETTY, S/O LATE K RANGAI YEARS OCC AGRICULTURIST, BO EM VILLAGE POST AND MANDA ...P AND MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPME EM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. A REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ARTMENT, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOO DY, THE DISTRICT ATI), CHITTOOR (TIRUPATI) DISTRI H, THE TAHSILDAR, YERRA ______________
DESH
JUNE LAPATI ED ABOUT 52 IAH CHETTY , OTH ARE R/O AL CHITTOOR PETITIONER(S) ENT OFFICER, ENGINEER, OR (TIRUPATI) COLLECTOR, CT. AVARIPALLEM,
CHITTOOR(TIRUPATI) DISTRICT.
5. HARIKRISHNA, THE VICE CHAIRMEN, TIRUPATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR (TIRUPATI) DISTRICT.
6. KRISHNA REDDY, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RWS AND S,C/O.MPDO OFFICE, YERRAVARIPALLEM, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. R 6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 28.11.2025, VIDE IA NO-2/2025 IN CC NO-3254 OF 2023 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct notices to the respondent and punish him for contempt of courts of the Hon'ble High court for willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble court dated 26.05.2022 passed in W.P. No. 15464 of 2022 by the Lordships Mr. Justice RAVI CHEEMALAPATI under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioner/1st respondent herein before this Hon'ble High Court as per the orders, dated 25-04-2025 in C.C.No. 3254 of 2023 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to implead the Proposed Respondent No.6 as party/respondent in the above C.C. No. 3254 OF 2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. S SIVA KUMARI
3. G VENKATA REDDY
4. NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L
The Court made the following order:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 26.05.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.15464 of 2022.
Sri Chaitanya Polisetty, learned counsel, representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 26.05.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.15464 of 2022 and the petitioners have received the amount. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the Contempt Case and accordingly prayed to close the Contempt Case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in the Contempt Case, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 24.06.2026 MP
Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:3254 of 2023 Date: 24.06.2026
MP