Andhra Pradesh High Court

AS/134/2026 of CHAMUNDI CONSTRUCTIONS Vs KONDAPALLI AUTOMOBILIES on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : 06.07.2026 APHC010663662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

Neutral Citation:__________

Date of pronouncement

: 24.06.2026

Date of uploading

: 06.07.2026

APHC010663662025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

APPEAL SUIT NO: 134/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CHAMUNDI CONSTRUCTIONS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MANCHALA NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS, REGD OFFICE AT FLAT NO.101, ROAD NO.5 STREET NO.9 SRI SAI APARTMENTS, NEHRU NAGAR,

WEST MAREDUPALLI, SECUNDERABAD - 500 026.

2. MANCHALA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. LATE M. NARASIMHAM AGED 65 YEARS, OCC. A PARTNERSHIP FIRM. REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER REGD OFFICE AT FLAT NO.101, ROAD NO.5 STREET NO.9 SRI SAI APARTMENTS, NEHRU NAGAR,

WEST MAREDUPALLI, SECUNDERABAD - 500 026.

...APPELLANT(S) AND

1. KONDAPALLI AUTOMOBILIES, Proprietary Concern, rep. by its Proprietor Kumba Padma W/o Srinivasa Rao, aged 53 years, Occ. Business, R/o. D.No.2, Opp. Sai Baba Temple, Kondapalli, Ibrahimpatnam, Vijayawada, Krishna District

...RESPONDENT

begs to prefer this Memorandum of Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated 16-06-2025 passed in OS.No.l of 2017 on the file of II Additional District Judge Vijayawada for the following among other IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the decree and Judgement dated 16-06-2025 passed in O.S. No.1 of 2017 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, pending disposal of the present Appeal Suit, and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. D SESHASAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent:

1. NALINI T

A.S.No.134 of 2026 This Court made the following JUDGMENT ((Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH) Pursuant to the memo 20.04.2026 filed by Sri D. Seshasayana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal suit is listed today under the caption “for withdrawal”.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal suit inter alia stating that the matter was amicably settled between the parties.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, A.S.No.134 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________ D. RAMESH, J

____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt: 24.06.2026 krk Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned

Reportable

Non-reportable ✓

A.S.No.134 of 2026

Dt: 24.06.2026 krk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead