Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/123/2009 of GULIPALLI SUDHAKAR, E.G.DIST., Vs SMT. GULIPALLI SHANKARI, E.G.DIST., & ANO. on 23 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 123/2009 Between: 1. GULIPALLI SUDHAKAR, E.G.DIST.,, S/O. LATE
APHC010252552009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 123/2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GULIPALLI SUDHAKAR, E.G.DIST.,, S/O. LATE SEETHARAMAIAH BUSINESS R/O. V.L.PURAM, RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT GULIPALLI SHANKARI E G DIST ANO, W/O. SUDHAKAR EMPLOYEE C/O. B.THATA RAO, D.NO. 86-8-3/1, TILAK ROAD, OPP: S.B.I., PERSONAL BANK, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
2. KILAPARTHI SREEENU, S/O. BANGARAIAH BUSINESS SRINIVASA ROLLING MILLS, THADITHOTA, NEAR MEKALA KABELA, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 119 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 47 days in preferring the present appeal against the order in O.P.No.52/2008 dt.2-12-2008 on the file of Judge, Family Court, East Godavari at Rajahmundry and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2009(FCAMP 258 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order dated 2.12.2008 in OP No.52/2008on the file of Judge, Family Court, East Godavari at Rajahmundry Counsel for the Appellant:
1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K S MURTHY The Court made the following:
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 123 of 2009 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
The present Family Court Appeal has been preferred challenging the order and decree dated 02.12.2008 passed by the Family Court, Rajahmundry in O.P.No.52 of 2008 in dismissing the petition filed by the appellant/petitioner herein for dissolution of marriage.
2. During the course of hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of both sides submitted that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalat. But no instructions from the clients.
3. Considering the same, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. If any instructions received from the parties, they are at liberty to file an application for restoration of the appeal. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 24.6.2026 RD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 123 of 2009 24.6.2026 RD