Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/182/2010 of S.K. SARDAR Vs SK. SALMA JABEEN on 23 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 182/2010 Between: 1. S.K. SARDAR, S/O. SHAIK BASHA WORKING AS
APHC010278202010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 182/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. S.K. SARDAR, S/O. SHAIK BASHA WORKING AS OFFICE ASSISTANT IN THE O/O. P.D.D.W.M.A., DAILY WAGE BASIS TEMPORARILY R/O. D.NO. 26-3-10, B.V.NAGAR,
...APPELLANT AND
1. SK SALMA JABEEN, D/o. Sri Shaik Mustafa Kamal Basha Working as Nurse in T.B.Hospital,Nellore R/o. D.No. 25/2882, Mahatma Gandhi Nagar, 7th Cross, Vedayapalam, Nellore District.
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(FCAMP 559 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 220 days in filing the above appeal in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant:
1. N SAMEENA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. M SUGUNA The Court made the following:
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 182 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
The present Family Court Appeal has been preferred challenging the order and decree dated 02.02.2009 passed by the learned Family Court, Nellore in F.C.O.P.No.314 of 2008 in dismissing the divorce petition filed by the appellant/petitioner herein.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
3. Hence the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 24.6.2026 RD
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 182 of 2010 24.6.2026 RD