Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/38/2009 of SYED IMTHIYAZ BASHA Vs SHAIK ZAREENA on 23 June 2026
Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : 06.07.2026 APHC010649342009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
Neutral Citation:__________
Date of pronouncement
: 24.06.2026
Date of uploading
: 06.07.2026
APHC010649342009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 38/2009
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SYED IMTHIYAZ BASHA, S/O CHAND BASHA R/O 24/1773 AMBEDKAR NAGAR, DARGAMITTA,
...APPELLANT AND
1. SHAIK ZAREENA, W/o Syed Imthiyaz Basha R/o Near Ramaiah Badi, Mulapet, Nellore-3.
...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersset aside the order passed in OP.NO.158 of 2008 dated 14-12-2008 on the file of the Family Court [M.C. NO. 12/2008 on the file of the II Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class,Nellore] Counsel for the Appellant:
1. N SAMEENA Counsel for the Respondent:
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 38/2009 This Court made the following JUDGMENT: (Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH)
The appeal is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant has not contacted with him. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. If the appellant wants to prosecute the matter, he is at liberty to file application and same may be considered for revival.
3. Accordingly, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed.
_____________ D. RAMESH, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt: 24.06.2026 krk Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ✓
F.C.A.No.38 of 2009
Dt: 24.06.2026 krk