Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/36323/2025 of Gunda Gopi Krishna Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 23 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 36323/2025 Between: 1. GUNDA GOPI KRISHNA, S/O LATE RAMBABU, AGED 28 YEARS,
APHC010709312025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GUNDA GOPI KRISHNA, S/O LATE RAMBABU, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC STUDENT, R/O FLAT NO 302, GVS YAKKALI HEIGHTS, BLOCK-2, IPPATAM ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-522238
2. ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, SRI KRISHNAPATNAM, PATHA VELUGUBANDA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, ADIKAVI NANNAYA UNIVERSITY, SRI KRISHNAPATNAM, PATHA VELUGUBANDA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order, orders or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus - i) declaring the action of Respondents 2 and 3 in putting a condition in revaluation application to submit specimen handwriting of the applicants contrary to the revaluation notification dt. 15-12- 2025 as illegal, arbitrary. discriminatory besides violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and ii) consequently, direct the respondents to receive the petitioners revaluation application without insisting on specimen handwriting and also without saying that cut-of date is already crossed and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to receive the petitioner’s revaluation application without insisting on specimen handwriting and also without saying that cut-of date is already crossed and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PEETA RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GADDE KOTI NAGULU SC For Adikavi nannaya University
2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
The Court made the following Order:
It is stated by Smt. Saanvi Thota, learned counsel representing Sri Peeta Raman, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition.
2. Recording the said submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 24-06-2026 MSI
Dated: 24-06-2026 MSI