Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30197/2024 of M/s Shahid Saw Mill Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 June 2026
for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement : 23-06-2026 Date of uploading : 04-07-2026. APHC010578222024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR
Date of reserved for orders
: -----------
Date of pronouncement
: 23-06-2026
Date of uploading
: 04-07-2026.
APHC010578222024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. M/S SHAHID SAW MILL, SY.NO.262/1A, CHINNAHULTHI VILLAGE
PATTIKONDA MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT REPT., BY ITS
OWNER D. SUBHAN S/O D. SATTAR SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 64YRS
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
FOREST
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE LEVEL COMMITTEE, REPT. BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM- PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE DISTRICT FOREST OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
4. THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT
5. M/S SRI MADDILETI SWAMY SAW MILL, SY.NO.180, PATTIKONDA
KURNOOL DISTRICT REPT., BY ITS OWNER K. RANJITH KUMAR
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.3 in not mentioning the Horizontal machinery with 20 HP motor capacity in the License No.29/2018 valid upto 31-12-2024 even inspite of the 5th respondent was permitted to run the vertical machinery and horizontal machinery and the ownership of the 5th respondent itself is changed in the name of the writ petitioner
and
consequently
issuing
Impugned
Proceedings
in
Rc.No.3185/2022/H6, dt.01-10-2024 in intimating that the additional machinery i.e. Horizontal 20 HP motor capacity could not be sanctioned in favour of the petitioner as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to the decision of the 2nd respondent in its 18th meeting held on 19-02-2024 and violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the Impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.3185/2022/H6, dt.01-10-2024 issued by the 3rd respondent and further direct the respondent No.3 to include the Horizontal machinery with 20HP motor capacity in the License No.29/2018, dt. 10-06-2024 granted to the petitioner permitting the writ petitioner to run both machinery of vertical and horizontal in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to run both Vertical and Horizontal machinery in pursuant to the License No.29/2018, dt.
10-06-2024 issued by the 3^^ respondent pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NAGENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR FORESTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the action of the respondents in not giving permission for the horizontal machinery in License No.29/2018 and consequently issuing impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.3185/2022/H6, dated 01.10.2024 in intimating that the additional machinery i.e. Horizontal 20 HP motor capacity could not be sanctioned in favour of the petitioner.
2. Heard Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Baliboina Sravani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests for the respondents.
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Forests would submit that during the pendency of the present petition, the respondent-authorities have given the permission to use Horizontal machinery under the License No.29/2018 to the petitioner in this matter and they are utilizing the same and no further orders are required in this petition.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of, setting aside the impugned Proceedings vide Rc.No.3185/2022/H6, dated 01.10.2024.
5. In light of the above submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of, setting aside the impugned proceedings vide Rc.No.3185/2022/H6, dated 01.10.2024. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.06.2026. UPS
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
Dt.23.06.2026
UPS