Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/5236/2022 of P. Karna Vs Nagaraju Naidu, on 22 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5236/2022 Between: 1. P. KARNA, S/O ANNAMALAI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010606842022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5236/2022
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. P. KARNA, S/O ANNAMALAI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.17/272, AMARAVATHI NAGAR, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. NAGARAJU NAIDU, THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. D CHANDRA SHEKAR, THE TAHSIIDAR, MANTRALAYAM MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act for will full violation of the orders of this Hon'ble court and for not implementing the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.13543 of 2022 dated 05/05/2022 by Hon'ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PONNADA SREE VYAS Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. T BALASWAMI
2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
The Court made the following Order:
As the main Writ Petition (W.P.No.13543 of 2022) has been disposed of, it would be appropriate to close the present Contempt Case, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise his objections and issues, as permitted in the order disposing the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
Date:23.06.2026
MJA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5236/2022
23.06.2026
MJA