FCA/127/2010 of PASUPULETI APPALA NARASAYYA NAIDU Vs KUM. PASUPULETI SAI KANAKA TEJASWINI AND 3 OTHERS on 22 June 2026

1. PASUPULETI APPALA NARASAYYA NAIDU, S/O. PASUPULETI VENKAYYA NAIDU DRIVER IN APSRTC MADDILAPALEM DEPOT R/O. HIG PLOT NO. 8, MARRIPALEM VUDA COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM

...APPELLANT AND

1. KUM PASUPULETI SAI KANAKA TEJASWINI AND 3 OTHERS, D/O. P.APPALA NARASAIAHA NAIDU STUDENT D.NO. 45- 260/16/4 PAMACHANDRA NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM BEING MINOR REP. BY THEIR MATERNAL GRAND MOTHER

2. KUM PASUPULETI DIVYASWINI, D/O. P.APPALA NARASAIAHA NAIDU STUDENT D.NO. 45-260/16/4 PAMACHANDRA NAGAR, AKKAYYAPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM BEING MINOR REP. BY THEIR MATERNAL GRAND MOTHER

3. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.M.OFFICE SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI

4. THE REGIONAL P F COMMISSIONER, P.F.OFFICE, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM (RR 3 AND 4 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES)

...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 312 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 53 days in filing the FCA IA NO: 2 OF 2010(FCAMP 319 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order and judgment passed in OP.No.73/2006 dated 29/01/2010 on the file of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the above appeal and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2010(FCAMP 320 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner/appellant for recall of his evidence particularly with respect of the predominant material document i.e., Salary Certificate issued by the APSRTC dated 15/02/2010 enabling the petitioner/appellant to prove his case in the FCA in the interest of justice and further prayed under the circumstnaces of the case favouring the petitioner reading the averments of the counter filed in OP.No.73/2006 and the FC appeal as part and parcel of this petition in the ends of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant:

1. M ROOPENDER Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. T M K CHAITANYA The Court made the following:

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)

The present Family Court Appeal has been preferred challenging the order and decree dated 29.01.2010 passed by the Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam in O.P.No.73 of 2006 granting maintenance at Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand only) per month to the elder minor child and Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only) per month to the younger minor child apart from granting Rs.20,000/- towards arrears of maintenance.

2. No representation for the appellant.

3. As the matter is of the year 2010, no stay was granted by this Court. The appellant was given liberty to move proper application before the Court concerned seeking time for payment of arrears of maintenance. In view of the same nothing is there to adjudicate on the aspect as the appeal is filed only aggrieved by the decree and order of the Court concerned.

4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 24.6.2026 RD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 127 of 2010 24.6.2026 RD