Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/116/2010 of AMOLOJU RAMABRAHMAM SRINIVAS SANYASI RAO Vs SMT.AMOLOJU NAGALAXMI on 22 June 2026
reserved for judgment Date of pronouncement Date of uploading APHC010377902010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116/2010 Between: 1. AMOLOJU RAMABRAHMAM SRINIVAS SANYASI
Date of reserved for judg
Date of pronouncement
Date of uploading
APHC010377902010
IN TH
TUESDAY
TWO
THE HON
THE HONOUR
FAMILY C
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. AMOLOJU RAMAB PRAKASA RAO G VISAKHAPATNAM
1. SMT AMOLOJU NA D.No.22-23-8 C/o. V Appeal under sectio appeal by setting aside t Judge, Visakhapatnam m such other order IA NO: 1 OF 2010 (FCAM Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup suspend the operation o gment : -----------
: 23.06.2026
: 02.07.2026 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUN O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH RABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAM COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116/2010 BRAHMAM SRINIVAS SANYASI RAO GOLDSMITH D.NO.22-18-7, BONDAV AND AGALAXMI, W/o. R.S.S.Rao @ Nan Vedurparthy Chittibabu Bukka Veedhi ...R on________ against orders to allow th the Judgment of the learned Addition made in MC.No.261/2005 dated 25/02 MP 293 OF 2010 on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma of the impugned Judgment of the lea DESH
NE H MALLI
O, S/O.SURYA VARI STREET ...APPELLANT naji House wife RESPONDENT he Family Court nal Family Court 2/2010 and pass mstances stated ay be pleased to arned Additional
Family Court Judge, Visakhapatnam made in MC.No.261/2005 dated 25/02/2010 and pass such other order Counsel for the Appellant:
1. M V S SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116 / 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D. Ramesh)
1. Being aggrieved by the Common Order dated 25.02.2010 passed in M.C.No.261 of 2005 by the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam, whereby maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month was awarded in favour of the respondent, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It is further noted that the present appeal pertains to the grant of maintenance.
3. In view of the absence of representation on behalf of the appellant and the nature of the appeal, this Court is of the considered view that no useful purpose would be served in adjourning the matter any further. Accordingly, the present Family Court Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. However, it is made clear that if the appellant has any grievance or instructions at a later stage, he shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application seeking restoration of the appeal, and if such application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law on its own merits. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders, if any, granted earlier shall stand vacated, and all pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH
__________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date: 23.06.2026 SAK Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 116 / 2010
Date: 23.06.2026
SAK