Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/591/2014 of THOGURU LATHA Vs ISKA VENKATA SAIBABA REDDY AND 2 OTHERS on 22 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 591/2014 Between: 1. THOGURU
APHC010071992014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 591/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THOGURU LATHA, W/O. T.JHASUVA HOUSEHOLD R/O. CHINTHAREDDYPALEM VILLAGE, NELLORE RURAL MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT
...APPELLANT AND
1. ISKA VENKATA SAIBABA REDDY AND 2 OTHERS, S/O. LATE SUBBARAMI REDDY AGRIL., D.NO. 16-1569 RAMAMURTHY NAGAR NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT
2. MEEJURU NARAYANA, S/O. M.PAPAIAH AGRIL., D.NO.R/O. KOTHAMITTAPALEM VILLAGE NELLORE BIT-II OF NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT
3. MEEJURU BUJJAMMA, W/O. M.NARAYANA
HOUSEHOLD D.NO.R/O. KOTHAMITTAPALEM VILLAGE NELLORE BIT-II OF NELLORE TOWN AND DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set aside the order dt. 05/04/2014 dismissing the application for grant of temporary injunction in IA.No. 532 of 2012 in OS.no. 333 of 2012 on the file of the court of the V Additional District Judge, Nellore IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 866 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the respondents, their agents, servants, henchmen or anybody acting through or under them from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit scheduled property as mentioned in OS.No. 333 of 2012 on the file of the court of the V Additional District Judge, Nellore Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M V S SURESH KUMAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 591/2014 This Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH)
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submits that cause in this appeal does not survive for further adjudication as pending appeal against I.A.No.532/2012 in O.S.No.333/20120, the main suit itself disposed of by the Court below and hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal becomes infructuous.
2. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_____________ D. RAMESH, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt: 23.06.2026 krk
C.M.A.No.591 of 2014
Dt: 23.06.2026 krk