Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/455/2015 of MRS. NITYA NAGINI Vs K. BALAKRISHNA REDDY & 5 OTHERS on 22 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 455/2015 Between: 1. MRS. NITYA
APHC010353982015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 455/2015
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MRS. NITYA NAGINI, W/O. M.BALAKRISHNA REDDY OCC:HOUSEHOLD, R/O.1ST FLOOR, PLOT NO. 45-A, JOURNALIST COLONY, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD-500 033.
...APPELLANT AND
1. K BALAKRISHNA REDDY 5 OTHERS, S/O. LATE K.PATTABHI RAMI REDDY, R/O. D.NO. 7-19-3, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. K MAHENDRA, S/O. LATE K.PATTABHI RAMI REDDY, R/O. KOTU HOUSE, D.NO. 9-14-1, C.B.M. COMPOUND, WALTAIR UPLANDS, VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. K SARAT, S/O. LATE K. PATTABHI RAMI REDDY, R/O. D.NO. 7-19-3, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. VISHNU PRIYA HOTELS AND RESORTS PVT LTD, REGD. OFFICE AT D.NO. 28-3, UPLANDS, WALTAIR MAIN ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. M/S M V V BUILDERS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, M.V.V. DATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE RAGHUNAYAKULU, PLOT NO. 11, MVV BEACH VILLA APARTMENTS, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
6. M/S M K BUILDERS, REGD. OFFICE AT D.NO. 15-1-37, NOWROJI ROAD, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the order in IA No. 811/2010 in OS No. 33 of 2010 on the file of the VI Addional District Judge Cum Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Visakhapatnam dated 30-4-2015 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 910 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim injunction restrainign the respondents or their Attorneys and agents from alienating, or selling or otherwise transferring or creating any third party interest in the suit schedule properties pending disposal of the above appeal or else the petitioner will suffer grave and irraparable loss and pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. D KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VL N G K MURTHY
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 455/2015 This Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH)
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submits that cause in this appeal does not survive for further adjudication as pending appeal against I.A.No.811/2010 n O.S.No.33/2010, the main suit itself disposed of by the Court below and hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal becomes infructuous.
2. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_____________ D. RAMESH, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt: 23.06.2026 krk
C.M.A.No.455 of 2015
Dt: 23.06.2026 krk