Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1228/2025 of D RAM PRASAD Vs SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR on 22 June 2026
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010221982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI
Neutral Citation:__________
Date of reserved for orders
:
Date of pronouncement
: 23.06.2026
Date of uploading
:
APHC010221982025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1228/2025
Between:
1. D RAM PRASAD, S/O.NARASIMHA MURTHI, AGE. 46 YEARS
,D.NO.2-277,ANJANEYA
NAGAR
,
RAMANAYYAPETA(V),KAKINADA ,KAKINADA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO
GOVERNMENT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION
,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
2. SRI SAGILI SHAN MOHAN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA
DISTRICT.
3. SRI G MALLIKARJUN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, KAKINADA
4. SRI MYLA VARAPU KRISHNA TEJA, COMMISSIONER OF
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT
OFFICER,TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. SRI V RAVI KUMAR, DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, KAKINADA KAKINADA DISTRICT.
6. SRI J NARASIMHA RAO, RAMAYYAPETA GRAMA PANCHAYAT
SECRETARY, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL. EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
7. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE
AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt. 03.10.2023 of this Hon'ble Court made in WP. No.22636/2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of WP.No.22636 of 2023 before the Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SINGAMSETTY V.M. SANKAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. Y KOTESWARA RAO
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 03.10.2023 passed in W.P.No.22636 of 2023.
Sri P.Ravikanth, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, as such, there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 23rd June, 2026 RKS
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable