WP/18832/2016 of Sheetal Kumar Jain Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary on 22 June 2026

1. SHEETAL KUMAR JAIN, S/O. TILOK CHAND JAIN, AGED 39 YEARS, BUSINESS, D.NO. 37-2-5, MARKET STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

2. USHA JAIN, W/O. TILOK CHAND JAIN, AGED 52 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, D.NO. 37-2-5, MARKET STREET, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (GRAM PANCHAYAT) ANDHRA PRADESH

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TOWN COUNTRY PLANNING, 85-7-20/1C, V,L. PURAM, YAMAHA SHOWROOM LANE, RAJEMAHENDRAVARAM - 533 103, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER NEAR RTO OFFICE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

5. THE THIMMAPURAM GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THIMMAPURAM, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL, EAST

RRR,J W.P.No.18832 of 2016

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the resolution of the 5th respondent in rejecting the application submitted by the petitioner for cancellation of layout L.P.No. 164/84B through covering letter dated Rc.No. 47/98, dated 16.09.1998 along with the resolution copy dated 22.08.1998, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and also violative of "Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the case of the petitioner afresh and pass appropriate orders by verifying the land physically and also obtain technical report IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 23114 OF 2016

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the resolution in rejecting the application for cancellation of layout L.P.No. 164/84B through covering letter dated Rc.No. 47/98, dated 16.09.1998 along with the resolution copy dated 22.08.1998 and pass appropriate orders by verifying the land physically and also obtain technical report, and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice pleased to recall the order dt. 18.04.2023 passed in the above writ petition to extent necessary by permitting the husband of the deceased 2nd petitioner to be impleaded as the 3rd petitioner as legal heir of the deceased 2nd petitioner herein and pass pleased to condone the delay of 182 days in re-presenting the above Interlocutory Applications and pass

RRR,J

pleased to recall the order dtl 8.04.2023 passed in the above writ petition to extent necessary and permit the husband of the deceased 2nd petitioner to be impleaded as the 3rd petitioner he being the person entitle to the subject property as per the will dt. 20.09.2019 of the deceased 3rd petitioner as legal heir of the deceased 2nd petitioner herein and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

2. A S C BOSE

3. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra

4. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP)

RRR,J W.P.No.18832 of 2016

The Court made the following Order:

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition as the proceedings challenged, before this Court, have been withdrawn.

2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

Date:23.06.2026 KPV

Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

RRR,J

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

WRIT PETITION No.18832 of 2016

23.06.2026

KPV