Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7240/2026 of Pamidi Sreenivasulu Yadav Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 June 2026
Citation:……………………… Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010137312026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD
Neutral Citation:………………………
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026
Date of uploading :
APHC010137312026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 7240/2026
Between:
1. PAMIDI SREENIVASULU YADAV, S/O.P NARAYANA YADAV, AGED
ABOUT 46 YEARS, LICENSEE OF M/S.VIJAYA DURGA WINES
(L.NO.114/2024-26),
R/O.P.VENKATAPURAM
VILLAGE,
YERRAGUNTLA MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516309.
2. SANNAPU REDDY SUJALA, W/O.S SREEDHAR REDDY, AGED
ABOUT 49 YEARS. LICENSEE OF M/S.VEERABHADRA WINES
(L.NO.111/2024-26),
R/O.D.NO.30-726,
BOMMALASATRAM,
NANDYALA, NANDYAL DISTRICT- 518502.
3. A.V.NAGENDRA PRASAD REDDY, S/O.A NAGI REDDY, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
LICENSEE
OF
M/S.NAGENDRA
WINES(L.NO.113/2024-26),
R/O.D.NO.1-152,
CHINNASINGANAPALLI, DUVVUR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-
516175.
4. RACHAKONDU SUBBARAYUDU, S/O.R.BALA SUBBAIAH, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS.
LICENSEE
OF
M/S.ROYAL
WINES
(L.NO.110/2024-26), R/O.KALVAKUNTIAVILLAGE, PORUMAMILLA
MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516193.
5. GAJJA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O.PEDDA VENKATAIAH, AGED
ABOUT 55 YEARS. LICENSEE OF M/S.BALAJI WINES (L.NO.
KDP/GK04/2024-26) R/O.D.NO. 4/211-A, CHINTHA KUNTA, C
BAYANAPALLI, DUVVUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT -
516175.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
PROHIBITION
AND
EXCISE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT. 522238.
2. THE DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE
DEPARTMENT, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522503.
3. THE
DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER,
PROHIBITION
AND
EXCISE
DEPARTMENT, KADAPA. 516001.
4. THE DISTRICT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE OFFICER, KADAPA.
516001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in fixing the Retail Excise Tax (RET) at f65,00,000/- per annum in respect of the petitioners licensed shops I.e., 1st petitioner L.No. 114/2024-26, 2nd petitioner
L.Nos.111/2024-26,
3rd
petitioner
L.No.113/2024-26
4th
petitioner
L.N0.110/2024-26, 5th petitioner L.No.KDP/GK04/2024-26, all are established and running in Mydukur Municipality, YSR Kadapa District, by erroneously treating the population of Mydukuru Municipality as above 50,000, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and contrary to Rule 15(1) read with Rule 2(t) of The Andhra Pradesh Excise (Grant of Licence of Selling by Shop and Conditions of Licence) Rules, 2024
and also contrary to the law laid down by this Honble Court in W.P.No.32237
of 2025 dated 12.12.2025, and consequently direct the respondents to refix/revise and collect the Retail Excise Tax payable by the petitioners licensed shops I.e., 1st petitioner L.No. 114/2024-26. 2nd petitioner
L.Nos.111/2024-26, 3rd petitioner L.No. 113/2024-26, 4th petitioner L.No.
110/2024-26, 5th petitioner L.NO.KDP/GK04/2024-26, all are established and running in Mydukur Municipality, YSR Kadapa District, by treating the
population of Mydukur Municipality as below 50,000 as per the official Census 2011 and levy the applicable RET of f55,00,000/- per annum, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to collect the Retail Excise Tax (RET)
payable by the petitioner’s licensed shops I.e., 1st petitioner L.No.114/2024- 26, 2nd petitioner L.Nos.111/2024-26, 3rd petitioner L.No.113/2024-26 4th petitioner L.No.110/2024-26, 5'^ petitioner L.No.KDP/GK04/2024-26, all are established and running in Mydukur Municipality, YSR Kadapa District, at ?55,00,000/- per annum, instead of f65,00,000/- per annum, without insisting upon payment of the higher amount, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. RAVULA NAGARJUNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Ravula Nagarjuna, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Nagaraju Pullagura, learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise appearing for the respondents, collectively submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 23.06.2026. JLV
Whether the order is: Speaking
Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 7240/2026
Date: 23.06.2026 JLV