Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8960/2026 of Sarpanjari Nithin Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 22 June 2026
_____________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of uploading : 30.06.2026 APHC010179972026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3562] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE
Neutral Citation: _____________
Date of reserved for orders
:
Date of pronouncement
: 23.06.2026
Date of uploading
: 30.06.2026
APHC010179972026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SARPANJARI NITHIN REDDY, S/O SARPANJARI THAMBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, R/O HOUSE NO.1-41, THUMMALAGUNTA, TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARY BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, AMARAVATHI
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, DGP OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLCIE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUPATI WEST POLICE STATION, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ more particularly in the form of writ of Habeas Corpus to direct the respondents to produce my father Shri Sarpanjari Thambi Reddy, aged about 60 years, before this Court and set him at liberty and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VMR LEGAL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
Heard Sri Venkatesh B Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. Sri Krishna Praneeth, learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits based on the written instructions that the detenue who was accused in Crime No.95 of 2026 was arrested and produced for remand. Learned Magistrate passed the order dated 02.04.2026 Vide CFR.No.2054 of 2026 directed the Investigation Officer to issue Section 35 of BNSS notice to him and release the detenue. The Investigation Officer issued a notice under Section 35 of BNSS to the detenue and released on the same day.
3. Written instructions are taken on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.
5. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed.
___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA,J
Dated:23.06.2026 AG
Whether the Order is:
Speaking Reasoned
Reportable Non-reportable
Dated:23.06.2026 AG