Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/15150/2026 of Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company (P) Ltd., Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 21 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 15150/2026 Between: 1. SREE GOKULAM CHIT

APHC010288652026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 15150/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SREE GOKULAM CHIT AND FINANCE COMPANY (P) LTD.,, NO.49, ARCOT ROAD, KODAMBAKKAM, CHENNAI-24, BRANCH AT D.NO.27-23-30, 2ND FLOOR, USHA ESTATES, GOPALREDDY ROAD, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, REP BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, R.SARAVANAN, S/O. RAMASWAMY

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (CT-II) DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP-522238.

2. THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST II, MACHILIPATNAM CIRCLE, NO.ILL DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, A.P- 520007.

3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ST, KRISHNALANKA CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, A.P-520013.

4. PUTTI SRINVASA RAO, S/O.MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.FLAT NO.203, VENKATA HEIGHTS, ASHRAMAM ROAD, PATAMATALANKA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, A.P-520010.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toleased to issue an appropriate Writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in issuing respective notices dated 30.04.2026 proposing to conduct auction against the property in an extent of Ac.06.11 cents in Sy No

s. 137/6 (Ac.5.10 cents) and Sy No. 138/2 (Ac.1.01 cents) situated at Jujjuvaram Vilage, Pamaru Mandal. Krishna District of the 4th respondent for recovery of arrears under GST Act though the said property validly mortgaged in favour of the petitioner company as collateral/secured asset as illegal, arbitrary, withoutjurisdiction and violation of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the auction notices dated 30.04.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings, pursuant to the auction notices dated 30.04.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent against the property in an extent of Ac.06.11 cents in Sy No’s.137/6(Ac.5.10 cents) and Sy No. 138/2 (Ac.1.01 cents) situated at Jujjuvaram Vilage, Pamaru Mandal, Krishna District of the respondent, pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass s Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. B V ANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX

The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

Heard Sri B. V. Anjaneyulu, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondents.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that, the present Writ Petition has become infructuous in as much as the proposed auction has been dropped. However, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, would submit that, the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach this Court, in the event of any future difficulty.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court, in the event of any future difficulty.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

_________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J

Date:22.06.2026 KPV

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

AND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

WRIT PETITION No.15150 of 2026 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)

22.06.2026

KPV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead