Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/1377/2006 of NAGI REDDY CHIRANJEEVI Vs K.DEMUDU & ANR on 21 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1377/2006 Between: 1. NAGI REDDY
APHC010114582006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. NAGI REDDY CHIRANJEEVI, S/O.MALLU NAIDU, HINDU R/O.NALLA
BILLI VILLAGE, VEPADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. K DEMUDU ANR, S/O.SITARAMAYYA, HINDU, AGED MAJOR
OWNER OF ACCIDENT VEHICLE R/O.D.NO.10-4-6, LANKAVANI
PALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL,
2. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REP BY ITS
DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, UNITED INDIA
INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., DO -III, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court IA NO: 1 OF 2006(MACMAMP 766 OF 2006
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 18 days in filing the MACMA pending disposal of the MACMA
IA NO: 1 OF 2007(MACMAMP 5762 OF 2007
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the appeal in MACMA No.1377 of 2006 by fixing a date.
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. KARRI SURYANARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. E VENUGOPAL REDDY
2. P B NARASIMHA MURTY
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The proceeding sheets dated 05.12.2023, 27.02.2024, 15.06.2026, would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.06.2026. UPS
Dt.22.06.2026
UPS