Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14798/2019 of B.Chitti Babu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 21 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14798/2019 Between: 1. B.CHITTI BABU,, S/O.MADHAVA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 46
APHC010316882019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14798/2019
Between:
1. B.CHITTI BABU,, S/O.MADHAVA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O.CHINNA RAJU KUPPAM, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL AND MARKETING
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR
OF
AGRICULTURAL
MARKETING OF A P, GUNTUR.
3. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, TIRUCHANUR, REP.
BY ITS SECRETARY, PADMAVATHI PURAM, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in seeking to construct the shops in front open space on the eastern side of shop No.43 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, and unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents not to make any constructions in the front open space of shop No.43 on the eastern side and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Gangisetty Rajeswara rao,Standing Counsel For Agricultural Marketing Committees
2.
WRIT PETITION NO: 14798 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.Saritha, learned counsel would submit that Sri P.Gangi Rami Reddy, learned counsel on record for the petitioner is no more and his name is deleted. She is the junior counsel for late Sri P.Gangi Rami Reddy and she has contacted the clients to pursue this matter. She was informed that the petition may be closed, since, they are not interested to prosecute the matter. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the petition.
2. Sri G. Rajeswara rao, learned Standing Counsel for the Agricultural Marketing Committees is in attendance.
3. Recording the submissions made, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders if any, shall stand vacated.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 22.06.2026. UPS
WRIT PETITION NO: 14798 of 2019
Dt.22.06.2026
UPS