Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12580/2026 of Kosanam Aruna Kumari, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 21 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3562] MONDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 12580/2026 Between: 1. KOSANAM ARUNA KUMARI,, W/O
APHC010241592026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JUNE 2026
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 12580/2026
Between:
1. KOSANAM ARUNA KUMARI,, W/O PRABHAKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O DOOR
NO.
10-109,
PENAMIURU
VILLAGE
AND
MANDAL
KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CHIEF
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR
AND
DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF JAILS, CENTRAL PRISON
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus to declare the Order of Detention vide File NoiREV- MAGLOPDL(PRC)/4/2026-SA(MAGL-1)-KCO, dated 17/04/2026 passed by the 2nd Respondent against Kosanam
Dayasagar son of Prabhakar, Rao, aged 27 Years, Door No.10- 109, Penamiuru Village and Mandal, Krishna District and consequential accord of approval vide G.O.RT.No. 849 Dated 28- 04-2026 issued by the 1st Respondent, as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith release the detenue by name Kosanam Dayasagar son of Prabhakar Rao, aged 27 Years Door No.10-109, Penamiuru Village and Mandal, Krishna District from the illegal detention by setting aside
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
of Detention vide File No REV- MAGLOPDL(PRC)/4/2026- SA(MAGL-1)-KCO, dated 17/04/2026 and consequential accord of approval vide G.O.RT.No. 849 Dated 28-04-2026 issued by the 1st Respondent and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to provide facilities as mandated under Rule 4 and 5 of the Regulation of place and conditions of detention order, 1986 and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SYED KHADER MASTAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:
Date of reserved for orders : ----------- Date of pronouncement
: 22-06-2026 Date of uploading
:
WRIT PETITION No.12580 of 2026 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This writ petition for Habeas Corpus has been filed challenging the order of preventive detention dated 17.04.2026 passed by the 2nd respondent-District Collector.
2. Time was granted to file the counter-affidavit.
3. Sri Kirthi Teja Kondaveeti, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, submits that after the report of the Advisory Board, the impugned order of detention has been revoked and in this regard G.O.RT.No.969, General Administration (SC-I) Department, dated 15.05.2026 has been issued.
4. A copy of the aforesaid G.O has been placed before the Court to show that the order of detention has been revoked and that the detenu has been directed to be released forthwith, if his presence is not required in connection with any other cases. However, he submits that the detenu has been released.
5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 22.06.2026 Pab
Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable ☑
WRIT PETITION No.12580 of 2026 DATE: 22.06.2026
Pab