Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/15936/2026 of Bavirisetty Varalakshmi Vs The State of A.P. on 18 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15936/2026 Between: 1. BAVIRISETTY VARALAKSHMI, D/O. BAVIRISETTY CHINNAIAH, AGED 34

APHC010303392026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 15936/2026

Between:

1. BAVIRISETTY

VARALAKSHMI,

D/O.

BAVIRISETTY

CHINNAIAH, AGED 34 YEARS, UN-EMPLOYEE, R/O

41/181/10, SANLLARAPURAM, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

( OC ) SI. NO 958,PIN CODE - 516002

2. SINGAMSETTY REVANTH KUMAR, S/O. PHANEENDRA

KUMAR, M/O. SEGU INDRANI, AGED 26 YEARS, UN- EMPLOYEE R/O 8-1-115/A, SUMITHRA NAGAR, TELUGU

GANGA ROAD, GOPAVARAM MAPADAL, BAVEL

MANDAL, BAVEL DISTRICT ( OC ) SI. NO 917,PIN CCPDE

- 516227

3. VAVINTAPARTHI

HARSHA

VARDHAN,

S/O.

VAVINTAPARTHI MURALI MOHAN, AGED 26 YEARS, UN-EMPLOYEE R/O 20-1-420/D2, SUBHASH NAGAR, KORLAGUNTA

TIRUPATI

URABAN,

CHITTOOR

DISTRICT,( OC ) SI. NO 1105, PIN CODE-516227

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF A P, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES ( R AND R)

DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR

DISTRICT. PINCODE.520002

2. THE

CHIEF

ENGINEER,

NTR

TELUGU

GANGA

PROJECT,

TIRUPATI,

CHITTOOR(

TIRUPATI)

DISTRICT.PINCODE.517507

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA

PINCODE.516001

4. THE

SUPERINTENDING

ENGINEER,

SOMASILA

PROJECT, DARGAMITTA, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT

PINCODE.524301

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pas orders in exercise of extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the respondents inaction in providing employment to the petitioner in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 98 Irrigation Department Dt. 15.4.1986

though their names were included in the list published @

http//kadapa.ap.nic.in

on

6.4.2023

as

arbitrary,

illegal,

discriminatory and violative of right to life. Article 14, 19, 21,and 300 A of the of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider his candidature for employment at par with the candidates mentioned in Memo No. 7477081/R and R/A2/2023-7 (C.No. 2116015) dt. 30.6.2025

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to consider petitioners' candidature for providing employment in terms of G.O.M.s No. 98 irrigation Department Dt. 15-04-1986 by extending the benefit at part with the candidates mentioned in

Memo No. 7477081/R and R/A2/2023-7 (C.No. 2116015) dt. 30- 06-2025 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. MADAMALA VENKATESWARLU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES II

The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

W.P.No.15936 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R:

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the inaction of the Respondents in not providing employment to the Petitioners in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The lands of the parents of the Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 were acquired at Kommuru, Uppatur, Bramhanapalli villages, for the purpose of the Somasila Project in the years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999. As per G.O.Ms.No.98, Irrigation (PROJ. WING) Department, dated 15.04.1986, employment was to be offered to the members of the displaced families or their dependents. The Petitioners, being the dependents of the original landowners, applied for employment in terms of the said G.O. However, though their names were reflected in the shortlisted eligible persons, their cases were not considered for employment. Hence, this Writ Petition is filed.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners relies on the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.40372 of 2018 and batch, and W.P.No.3445 of 2020, wherein employment was directed to be offered to the dependents of the landowners therein, and seeks similar relief in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the land acquisition took place in 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and, despite the lapse of more than 25 years, employment has still not been provided.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that cases of Petitioners will be considered and necessary action will be initiated for providing employment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.98 dated 15.04.1986, as per the rules in force.

5. Considering the fact that the lands of the Petitioners were acquired way back in 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, the delay in providing employment cannot be justified; more so, as the employment was to be treated as part of the promised compensation.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondents to consider the cases of the Petitioners for employment on par with similarly placed persons, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 19.06.2026 chs

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO:15936/2026 Dt. 19.06.2026

chs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead