Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/883/2026 of Kongala Baby Sarala Kumari, Vs Telaganeni (Thati) Vasundhara Devi, on 18 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 883/2026 Between: 1. KONGALA BABY SARALA KUMARI,, W/O LATE VIJAYENDRA

APHC010148822026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 883/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KONGALA BABY SARALA KUMARI,, W/O LATE VIJAYENDRA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS. RETIRED TEACHER, R/O D.NO.31-63, CHANDRAIAH NAGAR, MAIN ROAD, 0PP. MINERAL WATER PLANT, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. TELAGANENI THATI VASUNDHARA DEVI, W/o Late Thati Mallikharjuna Rao, Aged about 73 years. Retired Teacher, R/o D.No. 12-8-17, Vaddurivari Street, Kothapet, Guntur City, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.

...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 10-02-2026 passed in I.A.No.268/2025 in O.S.No.518/2018 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Guntur and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.518/2018 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the Civil Revision petition on the file of the Hon’ble Court and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. RAVI CHANDAVARAPU Counsel for the Respondent:

1. The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

Date: 19.06.2026 KA

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 883/2026 Date: 19.06.2026 KA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead