Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/347/2026 of SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS Vs G SAI PRASAD on 18 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 347/2026 Between: 1. SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/ A , JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST
APHC010038252026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 347/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SAGITTAL INFRA PROJECTS, DOOR NO 9-2-228/A, JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER SRI K. KRISHNA KISHORE
...PETITIONER AND
1. G SAI PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PRI SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES (CAD) DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE PRL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
3. R MOHANA RAO, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION,
VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
4. B ANJANEYA PRASAD, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KRISHNA EASTERN DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
5. KATTA SOMAIAH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents .herein for violating the Orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P. No 9467 of 2024 -dated n 14.07.2025 in the interest of Justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
The Court made the following order:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order under contempt is complied with. The same is confirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In such circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present contempt case and accordingly the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Dt.19.06.2026 JLV
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.C.No.347 OF 2026 Date: 19.06.2026
JLV