Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/164/2010 of SIMHADRI NAGESWARA RAO Vs SIMHADRI KALAVATI @ MADHAVI on 18 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2573/2025 Between: 1. SRI. THETALI GOLLA REDDY, S/O.T.RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS OCC- BUSINESS R/O. H NO 730/49 AND
APHC010479722025
IN THE H
(
FRIDAY, T
TWO T
THE HONOU
CONT
Between:
1. SRI. THETALI GOLLA
73 YEARS OCC- BU
TOWN, ANAPARTH
DISTRICT, A.P - 5333
1. SRI K VIJAYANAND
DEPARTMENT SEC
DISTRICT A P
2. SRI V VEERABHADR
P E P D C L ANAPA
9440812649, PIN- 533
3. SRI V V V GOPAL
ELECTRICAL ENGIN
EAST GODAVARI DIS
4. SRI NALLAMILLI SA
MAJOR, OCC AG
STREET OLD TOWN
GODAVARI DISTRICT
5. SRI RAMA REDDY
KNOWN AGED MAJO
STREET OLD TOWN
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
URABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
TEMPT CASE NO: 2573/2025
A REDDY, S/O.T.RAMA REDDY AGE
SINESS R/O. H NO 730/49 AND 766
Y VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST G
...PE
AND
D IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO
CRETARIAT BUILDINGS AMARAVATI
RA RAO, THE ASST ENGINEER OPERA
ARTHI EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT A
LAKRISHNAN, THE ADDITIONAL DI
EER OPERATIONS A P E P D C L AN
STRICT A P CELL 9440812603, PIN- 53
MBASIVA REDDY, , S/O NOT KNOW
GRICULTURE R/O OPP VINAYAKA
N ANAPARTHY VILLAGE AND MAND
TA P, PIN- 533342
ALIAS VENKATA RAMA REDDY,
OR, OCC MASON R/O OPP VINAYAKA
N ANAPARTHY VILLAGE AND MAND
ED ABOUT
6/85, OLD
GODAVARI
TITIONER
ENERGY
GUNTUR
ATIONS A
A P CELL
IVISIONAL
NAPARTHI
33342
WN. AGED
TEMPLE
AL EAST
S/O NOT
A TEMPLE
AL EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICTA P, PIN- 533342
6. SRI V SESHAGIRI, LINE INSPECTOR / ELECTRICAL, A P E P D C L
ANAPARTHI EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT A P CELL 9440904514, PIN- 533342
7. SRI S RAJESH, .LINEMEN A P E P D C L ANAPARTHI EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT A P CELL 9493793674, PIN- 533342
8. SRI SREENU NAIK, SUB-INSPECTOR, A P E P D C L ANAPARTHI
EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT A P CELL 8919933154, PIN- 533342
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to initiate action against the respondents nos 2 and 3
herein under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 for disobeying of this Honble Court orders Dated.01.05.2020, 08.05.2020, 15.07.2020, 04.08.2020, 18.08.2020 and 15.09.2020 passed in W.P No.
8339 of 2020 and punish the respondents under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts and grant Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K GANI REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.V V SATISH
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2573/2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case has been filed by the petitioner herein in violation of the orders of this Court dated 01.05.2020, 08.05.2020, 15.07.2020, 04.08.2020, 18.08.2020 & 15.09.2020 passed in W.P.No.8339 of 2020, wherein this Court has directed the respondents to maintain Status Quo as on the date.
2. Pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 27.04.2026, respondent Nos.4 to 8 appeared and pleaded ignorance.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents brought to the notice of this Court that, though the petitioner's grievance is primarily with regard to the erection of an electric pole at H.No.7-30/49, the petitioner is, in fact, having two houses, namely, H.No.7-30/49 and H.No.7-66/85, situated opposite Vinayaka Temple Street, Old Town, Anaparthy Village and Mandal, East Godavari District.
4. In view of the interim directions granted by this Court, the Gram Panchayat has marked the location for erection of the pole behind the petitioner's house bearing H.No.7-66/85.
5. Considering the aforesaid submissions and also taking into account the ignorance pleaded by respondent Nos.4 to 8, this Court is of the opinion that there is no willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court. Hence, the personal appearance of respondent Nos.4 to 8 is hereby dispensed with.
6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed
__________________
JUSTICE D RAMESH Dated : 19.06.2026 TJN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2573/2025 Dated : 19.06.2026
TJN