Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/575/2026 of M.S. INFRA Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS on 18 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 575/2026 Between: 1. M.S. INFRA, D.NO.I-S-SHO-II, CHENNA REDDY COLONY, PULIVENDULA, YSR
APHC010063942026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 575/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M.S. INFRA, D.NO.I-S-SHO-II, CHENNA REDDY COLONY, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR.D.SRIKANTH REDDY.
2. D.SRIKANTH REDDY, S/O. D. RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, M.S.INFRA, D.NO.1- 3-549-11, CHENNA REDDY COLONY, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SATHISH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, ENGINEER IN CHIEF (ADMN), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SERVICE ROAD, CURRENCY NAGAR, RAMAVARAPPADU RING, VIJAYAWADA, A.P.
3. K SREENIVASULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, W R D, IRRIGATION
CIRCLE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. M L N VARA PRASAD, S/O.NOT KNOWN, ENGINEER IN CHIEF(ADMN), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SERVICE ROAD, CURRENCY NAGAR, RAMAVARAPPADU RING, VIJAYAWADA, A.P. 520001.
5. ABDUS SAMI, S/O NOT KNOWN, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, W R D, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT-516001. RR 4 AND 5 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 24.04.2026, VIDE IA NO- 1/2026 IN CC NO-575 OF 2026
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed respondents as respondents No.4 and 5 in CC.No.575 of 2026 against the orders in W.P.No.27013 of 2024 dated 28.07.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K NAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
The Court made the following order:
It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order under contempt has been complied with. The same is confirmed by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
In such circumstances, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present contempt case and accordingly the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Dt.19.06.2026 JLV
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.C.No.575 OF 2026 Date: 19.06.2026
JLV