Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1811/2026 of Shaik Subhani, Vs N.Naga Malleshwara Rao, on 18 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1811/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK SUBHANI,, S/O. BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC
APHC010099792026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1811/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SHAIK SUBHANI,, S/O. BUDE SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MACHAVARAM TOWN, MOTHARU BAZAAR, MACHAVARAM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER AND
1. N NAGA MALLESHWARA RAO, THE TAHSILDAR, MACHAVARAM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, A.P.
2. SMT VALISALA VENKATA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O VALISALA LAKSHMI KOTAIAH, AGE MAJOR, OCC HOUSE WIFE,
MACHAVARAM VILLAGE, MACHAVARAM MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent for his deliberate violation and non- implementing the Orders dated 21/03/2025, passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.
No. 42610 of 2022 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BHUVANAGIRI SUBRAMANYA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. J DILEEP KUMAR
The Court made the following order:
It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the respondents that the order under contempt has been complied with. It is further stated that the Tahsildar, Machavaram, has also issued proceedings dated 13.04.2026 to that effect.
In that view of the matter, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present contempt case and accordingly the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Dt.19.06.2026 JLV
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.C.No.1811 OF 2026 Date: 19.06.2026
JLV