Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/10854/2026 of E.Anjanaylu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 18 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10854/2026 Between: 1. E.ANJANAYLU, C/O E.GANGULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O
APHC010190762026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10854/2026
Between:
1. E.ANJANAYLU, C/O E.GANGULAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS,
R/O
11-68,
VEERAPPA
GARIPALLI,
OBULADEVARACHERUVU, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.515531
2. D. CHENNAKESAVULU, S/O D.GANGULAPPA,AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS,
R/O
7-C-1,
SESAIAHGARIPALLI
VILLAGE,
OBULADEVARACHERUVU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
3. U. CHANDRA SHEKAR, S/O U. VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 40
YEARS,
R/O
10,
VANUKUVARIPALLI
-VILLAGE,
OBULADEVARACHERUVU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
4. A. GANGULAPPA, S/O A. VENKATAIAH AGED ABOUT 42
YEARS,
R/O
7-128,
SESAIAHGARIPALLI
VILLAGE,
OBULADEVARACHERUVU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
5. J. VENKATA NARAYANNA, S/O CHINNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50
YEARS,
R/O
12-3-C,
DIGUVAPALLI
VILLAGE,
OBULADEVARACHERUVU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
6. K. VIJAY KUMAR, S/O K. CHINA ANJIAPPA AGED ABOUT 35
YEARS, R/O 10-20B, JAMMULA VANDHAPALLI VILLAGE, OBULADEVARACHERUVU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
7. P.RANGANAYAKULU, S/O POOJARIRANGAPPA AGED ABOUT
40 YEARS, R/O 4/88 MAIN ROAD, MALAKAVARI PALLI, SURAMPALLI (V) SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
8. D.CHALAPATHY, AGED S/O PEDDA SUBBANNA ABOUT 55
YEARS,
R/O
13-108,
BATHINAPALLI,
OBULADEVARACHERUVUMANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
9. M. ANJANEYULU, S/O M. VENKATARAMANA AGED ABOUT 35
YEARS,
R/O
1/,
RAMIREDDIPALLI
VILLAGE,
OBULADEVARACHERUVU MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI
2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B, SRI SATYA SAI
DISTRICT.
3. THE
PROJECT
DIRECTOR,
NATIONAL
HIGHWAYS
AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NHAI PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
UNIT KADAPA ANDHRA PRADESH .
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in threatening to remove/dismantle the Statute of Sri Vadde Obanna in the middle of the Service Road on the Divider at Obuladevara Cheruvu village and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, Andhra Pradesh, without following due process of law without there being any hindrance caused to anybody, without following the due process of Law, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional, and consequently direct the respondent authorities not to take any coercive steps without following the due process of Law IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to remove the Statute of
Sri Vadde Obanna in the middle of the Service Road on the Divider at Obuladevara Cheruvu village and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, Andhra Pradesh, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V BABY RANI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. CHAUDHARY AND CHAUDHARY ADVOCATES AND
SOLICITORS LAW FIRM
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri M.S.P.Reddy, learned counsel representing Smt.V.Baby Rani, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 19th June, 2026
RKS