Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15928/2026 of G PURUSHODI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 18 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15928/2026 Between: 1. G PURUSHODI, S/O. LAKSHMU NAIDU, AGED 60
APHC010306182026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 15928/2026
Between:
1. G PURUSHODI, S/O. LAKSHMU NAIDU, AGED 60 YEARS, WORKING AS GRADE-1 PRINCIPAL AT MAHATMA JYOTIBA
PHULE ANDHRA PRADESH BACKWARD CLASS WELFARE
RESIDENTIAL (MJPAPBCWR) SCHOOL AND JR. COLLEGE
(BOYS), SIMHACHALAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT -
530028.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL
CHIEF SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE HR-IV FR
AND LR, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT -
522237.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, B.C. WELFARE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237.
3. THE MAHATMA
JYOTIBA PHULE ANDHRA PRADESH
BACKWARD CLASS WELFARE RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTION
SOCIETY MJ, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, KUNCHUNAPALLI, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522501.
4. THE MAHATMA JYOTHIBA PHULE ANDHRA PRADESH
BACKWARD CLASS WELFARE RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL AND
JUNIOR COLL, SIMHACHSLAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
- 530028.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ pr Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the memo issued by the respondent circular Memo No. HR-IV
dt.23.09.2022 is as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of Article 14 of Constitution of India as it is contrary to G.O. Ms. No. 15
dt.31.01.2022 and as well as G.O. Rt. No. 68 dt. 10.05.2018 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Grade-1 Principal in the 4th respondent School and Jr. College (B) till he attain the age of superannuation of 62 years as per G.O. Ms. No.
15 dated 31-01-2022 with all regular benefits by setting aside the circular memo No.
1813129/
FIN01-HR-
212/2022-HR-IV
dt.23.09.2022 issued by the 1st respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Grade-I Principal in the 4th respondent School & Jr. College (B) till he attain the age of superannuation of 62
years pursuant to G.O.Ms. No. 15 dated 31-01-2022 by suspending the circular Memo No. 1813129/ FIN01- HR-212/2022-HR-IV dated 23.09.2022 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
2. GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
Writ Petition No:15928 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed seeking continuation of the Petitioner, who is an employee of Mahatma Jyotiba Phule, A.P. Backward Class Welfare Residential School and Junior College, till the age of superannuation of 62 years in terms of G.O.Ms.No.15, Finance (HR.IV-FR&LR) Department, dated 31.01.2022, whereunder the age of superannuation of Government Employees was enhanced to 62 years.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that this Court in W.P.No.4913 of 2024 and batch, had allowed the claims of similarly placed persons vide its order, dated 29.01.2026, and no appeal was filed thereon.
3. Sri P. Ravi Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondent No.3, does not dispute the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner.
4. In the light of the submissions made and in terms of the Orders passed in W.P.No.4913 of 2024 and batch, dated 29.01.2026, the present Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions: i) The Petitioner shall be continued in service till the age of 62 years.
ii) There shall be no order as to costs.
5. The Registry is directed to append a copy of the Order passed in W.P.No.4913 of 2024, dated 29.01.2026, to this Order.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
Date: 19.06.2026
chs
W.P.No.15928 of 2026 Dated: 19.06.2026
chs