WP/806/2023 of Siddam Sreenuvasa Kalyan, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 17 June 2026

1. SIDDAM SREENUVASA KALYAN,, S/O. VENKATA RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. GRADUATE, R/O. D. NO. 1/1129-1, YERRAMUKKAPALLI, CUDDAPAH, CUDDAPAH, ANDHRA PRADESH-516004.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER

EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DIST., ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE CHAIRMAN, ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, SECOND FLOOR, NEW HOD'S BUILDINGS, MG ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. THE SECRETARY, ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, SECOND FLOOR, NEW HOD'S BUILDINGS, MG ROAD MG ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THE CHAIRMAN, AP STATE HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not issuing the hall ticket to the petitioner in respect of his application bearing OTPR ID. AP1000095591 in respect of the Notification No.28/2022, dated 30.09.2022, for the direct recruitment to the posts of Group-I services in allowing him to attend the examination dated 08.01.2023, in due consideration of his representation dated 03.01.2023 as is illegal arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violative of articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to participate in the examination to be held on 03.01.2023 as per the schedule and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to attend the examination to be held on 08.01.2023 in respect of notification No 28/2023 dated 30.09.2023 and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to permit the petitioner to the allow thepetitioner to attend the mains examination to be held on held from 03.06.2023 to 10.06.2023 and pass such other order or orders in accordance with law, pending disposal of the writ petition in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to receive the Reply copy on record by allowing the leave petition in W.P. NO. 806/2023, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES III

2. V.VENKATA NAGA RAJU (SC FOR APPSC)

The Court made the following ORDER:

Sri A.Tarun Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous.

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.06.2026 rsd

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 806/2023

Date: 18.06.2026 rsd