Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1829/2012 of K.Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Vs The State Bank of India, on 17 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1829/2012 Between: 1. K.VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O K.HANUMANTHA REDDY,
APHC010307602012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1829/2012
Between:
1. K.VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O K.HANUMANTHA REDDY, H.NO.79-10-139, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL
2. G.RAVIKUMAR,,
S/O
G.LAKXMINARAYANA,
H.NO.80-11-7-C,
KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL
3. P.VENKATARAMANA
REDDY,,
S/O
P.NARAPA
REDDY,
GOVT.DEGREE COLLEGE (MEN) SRIKAKULAM
4. K.N.C.KALAVATHI,, W/O K.RAGHURAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50
YRS, FLAT NO.109, SV PARADISE, DHARMAPETA, KURNOOL
5. C.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA DAS,, S/O C.LAKSHMINARAYANA DAS, FLAT NO.201, VC RESIDENCY, GOOTY ROAD, KURNOOL
6. SMT.A.RUPA DEVI,, D/O G.ADISESHU, H.NO.40/787-D6, NEHRU
NAGAR, KURNOOL
7. SMT.G.SUREKHA,, W/O G.RAMACHANDRAREDDY, H.NO.51-1027- 1, SEETHARAMANAGAR, KURNOOL
8. U.RAJESH KUMAR,, S/O LATE TIRUPALAIAH, H.NO.8011-60, 1ST
FLOOR, NEAR WATER TANK, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL
9. B.VIRUPAKSHAIAH,, S/O B.BASAIAH, VEO AGRL.DEPARTMENT, KOTHAPETA
10. B.YELLA REDDY,, S/O LATE B.SESHIREDDY, H.NO.80/70-F-503, NEW KRISHNANAGAR, KURNOOL
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, KING KOTI, HYDERABAD.
2. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, U-CON PLAZA, PARK ROAD, KURNOOL
3. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, TIFC
BRANCH, GAYATRI ESTATE, KURNOOL
4. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SREENAGAR COLONY BRANCH, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
5. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MARKETYARD BRANCH, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
6. THE V C GARDENS, REP.BY ITS K.RAM PRASAD, FLAT NO.301, AVR HOMES, PRAKASHNAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL TOWN,
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in not rectifying the entries with regard to amounts credited to VC Gardens Current Account No.31113745049 to VC Gardens Cash Credit Account No.31212571032
from
the
Account
Numbers
i.e.,
31113693441,
31113679175, 31498758794, 31495655656, 31151979207, 31151969629, 31324964151, 31317285170, 31269209654, 31265926835, respectively and further direct the respondents to inform the outstanding amount to enable to the petitioner to pay the same IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 2274 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to initiate any further action in pursuance to the Notice Account No.31212571032, dt.13.8.2011 of the 3rd respondent, pending final disposal of the Writ Petition
IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 2500 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.2274 of 2012 in W.P.No.1829 of 2012, dt.27/1/12
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY
2. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, appeared through virtual mode and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 18.06.2026. JLV
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1829/2012
Date: 18.06.2026 JLV