Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1829/2012 of K.Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Vs The State Bank of India, on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1829/2012 Between: 1. K.VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O K.HANUMANTHA REDDY,

APHC010307602012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 1829/2012

Between:

1. K.VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY,, S/O K.HANUMANTHA REDDY, H.NO.79-10-139, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL

2. G.RAVIKUMAR,,

S/O

G.LAKXMINARAYANA,

H.NO.80-11-7-C,

KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL

3. P.VENKATARAMANA

REDDY,,

S/O

P.NARAPA

REDDY,

GOVT.DEGREE COLLEGE (MEN) SRIKAKULAM

4. K.N.C.KALAVATHI,, W/O K.RAGHURAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50

YRS, FLAT NO.109, SV PARADISE, DHARMAPETA, KURNOOL

5. C.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA DAS,, S/O C.LAKSHMINARAYANA DAS, FLAT NO.201, VC RESIDENCY, GOOTY ROAD, KURNOOL

6. SMT.A.RUPA DEVI,, D/O G.ADISESHU, H.NO.40/787-D6, NEHRU

NAGAR, KURNOOL

7. SMT.G.SUREKHA,, W/O G.RAMACHANDRAREDDY, H.NO.51-1027- 1, SEETHARAMANAGAR, KURNOOL

8. U.RAJESH KUMAR,, S/O LATE TIRUPALAIAH, H.NO.8011-60, 1ST

FLOOR, NEAR WATER TANK, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL

9. B.VIRUPAKSHAIAH,, S/O B.BASAIAH, VEO AGRL.DEPARTMENT, KOTHAPETA

10. B.YELLA REDDY,, S/O LATE B.SESHIREDDY, H.NO.80/70-F-503, NEW KRISHNANAGAR, KURNOOL

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, KING KOTI, HYDERABAD.

2. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICE, U-CON PLAZA, PARK ROAD, KURNOOL

3. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, TIFC

BRANCH, GAYATRI ESTATE, KURNOOL

4. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, SREENAGAR COLONY BRANCH, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

5. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, MARKETYARD BRANCH, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT

6. THE V C GARDENS, REP.BY ITS K.RAM PRASAD, FLAT NO.301, AVR HOMES, PRAKASHNAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL TOWN,

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 5 in not rectifying the entries with regard to amounts credited to VC Gardens Current Account No.31113745049 to VC Gardens Cash Credit Account No.31212571032

from

the

Account

Numbers

i.e.,

31113693441,

31113679175, 31498758794, 31495655656, 31151979207, 31151969629, 31324964151, 31317285170, 31269209654, 31265926835, respectively and further direct the respondents to inform the outstanding amount to enable to the petitioner to pay the same IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 2274 OF 2012

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to initiate any further action in pursuance to the Notice Account No.31212571032, dt.13.8.2011 of the 3rd respondent, pending final disposal of the Writ Petition

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 2500 OF 2013

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.2274 of 2012 in W.P.No.1829 of 2012, dt.27/1/12

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. P RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY

2. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, appeared through virtual mode and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 18.06.2026. JLV

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 1829/2012

Date: 18.06.2026 JLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead