Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6106/2025 of C IMAN Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 17 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6106/2025 Between: 1. C IMAN, S/O R RAJA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O
APHC010120672025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 6106/2025
Between:
1. C IMAN, S/O R RAJA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC
BUSINESS R/O D.NO.27-94, 6TH CROSS, RAM NAGAR
COLONY, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (PUBLIC
TRANSPORT) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. ANDHRA
PRADESH
STATE
ROAD
TRANSPORT
CORPORATION, (APSRTC),VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, REP
BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
3. THE DISTRICT PUBLIC TRANSPORT OFFICER, ANDHRA
PRADESH
STATE
ROAD
TRANSPORT
CORPORATION,
CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD
TRANSPORT
CORPORATION,
CHITTOOR,
CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
5. THE DEPOT MANAGER DEPOT1, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE
ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, more particularly the 3rd Respondent in issuing proceedings No. C1 /T2/122(2)/2021 -RM(T)/DPTO dated 12.02.2025
terminating the license No. T2/122(2)/2021- RM(T) dt.18.02.2021 of the Petitioner which is issued to run the business of Sweets and Bakery stall at OS No.2, as being illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g)
and 21 of the Constitution of India and Consequently set aside the proceedings No.C1/T2/122(2)/2021-RM(T)/DPTO dated 12.02.2025
issued by the 3rd Respondent and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings No.C1/T2/122(2)/2021- RM(T)/DPTO dated 12.02.2025 and permit him to run the shop, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AJAY KUMAR KANAPARTHI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
2. GP FOR TRANSPORT
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms.D.H.S.Sandhya, learned counsel representing Sri Ajay Kumar Kanaparthi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 18th June, 2026
RKS