Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1207/2024 of Sri Narina Pulleswararao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 17 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1207/2024 Between: 1. SRI NARINA PULLESWARARAO,, S/O. VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT 60

APHC010019462024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 1207/2024

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SRI NARINA PULLESWARARAO,, S/O. VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE LAKKAVARAM P.A.C.S., LAKKAVARAM VILLAGE, MALKIPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI/ DR.B.AMBEDKAR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR/DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, . EAST GODAVARI/DR.B. AMBEDKAR DISTRICT, A.P.

3. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI/DR.B. AMBEDKAR DISTRICT, A.P.

4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK, EAST GODAVARI/KAKINADA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

5. THE LAKKAVARAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY, REP. BY ITS CHAIR-PERSON, LAKKAVARAM VILLAGE, MALKIPURAM MANDAL,

EAST GODAVARI/DR.B. AMBEDKAR DISTRICT, A.P.

6. SRI SAKA VENKATESHWARA RAO, S/O. S.MUSALIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O LAKKAVARAM VILLAGE

,MALKIPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI/DR.B. AMBEDKAR DISTRICT, A.P.

7. SRI A VENKATRA RAO, S/O.A.SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O LAKKAVARAM VILLAGE, MALKIPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI/DR.B. AMBEDKAR DISTRICT, A.P.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in issuing D.No.2222/2023-B, dated 27.12.2023 by invoking the power under Section 59 of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 (here after referred as the Act,) thereby directing the 5th Respondent to suspend the petitioner, without any juridiction and further action of the 5th Respondent suspending the petitioner by resolution dated 30.12.2023 basing on the said proceedings, contrary to direction of the 3th Respondent directions, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and contrary to the principles of natural justice, contrary to the provisions of Section 115-D (2) of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and rules made therein, contrary to the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same as viod and without any juridiction and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings of 2nd respondent vide D.No. 2222/2023- B, dated 27-12-2023 and consequential proceedings of the 5th respondent dated 30-12-2023, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the Respondents No.1 to 3 in the Writ

Petition No. 1207 of 2024 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to grant leave for filling the Counter affidavit by receive it to the record of W.P.No.1207 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. G V SHIVAJI

2. GP FOR COOPERATION

3. SRINIVAS BASAVA

The Court made the following ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous.

In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated.

__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.06.2026 rsd

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 1207/2024

Date: 18.06.2026 rsd

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead