Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33071/2018 of M/s. Sri Venkatramana Agencies, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 16 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33071/2018 Between: 1. M/S. SRI VENKATRAMANA AGENCIES,, PROPRIETOR, SRI
APHC010687242018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI
PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33071/2018
Between:
1. M/S. SRI VENKATRAMANA AGENCIES,, PROPRIETOR, SRI P. SUBBA RAO, DOOR NO. 10/244-B, M.G. ROAD, RAILWAY KODUR MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KADAPA,
3. THE MANDAL AGRICULTURE OFFICER, RAILWAY
KODUR MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the respondents as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional in seizing the stock 283 bags of MOP (IPL), 30 bags of 20.20.0.13 (PPL)
and 07 bags of 12.32.16 (smart) by not considering the account of sales and return of the damaged stock although there is no variation in the stock register as well as physical stock in the shop and to and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to release the seized stock of 283 bags of MOP (IPL), 30 bags of 20.20.0.13 (PPL) and 7 bags of 12.32 .16 (Smart) to the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to not conduct auction of the seized stock, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 3 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in IA.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.33071 of 2018, dated 14.09.2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33071 of 2018
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “...to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the respondents as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional in seizing the stock 283 bags of MOP (IPL), 30 bags of 20:20:0:13 (PPL) and 07 bags of 12:32:16 (smart) by not considering the account of sales and return of the damaged stock although there is no variation in the stock register as well as physical stock in the shop…”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Popuri Lakshmi Priyanvita, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since, the relief has become infructuous in this matter.
3. Ms. M. Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture for the respondents is in attendance.
4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.06.2026. LSP
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33071 of 2018
Date: 17.06.2026. LSP