Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1450/2023 of INDUKURU RADHAMMA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 16 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1450/2023 Between: 1. INDUKURU RADHAMMA, C/O-N. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
APHC010030052023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1450/2023
Between:
1. INDUKURU RADHAMMA, C/O-N. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY RAJU
AGE 65 YEARS, N/O YANDAGANDI VILLEGE WEST GODAVARI, R/O
1-1-20/3,
1ST
ROAD
VAMSI
KRISHNA
NAGAR
NEAR
ADDAVANTENA, JUVVALAPALEM ROAD, BIMAVARAM, SIVARAO
PET, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND MARKETING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
COMMISSIONER,
AGRICULTURE
AND
MARKETING
DEPARTMENT GUNTUR.A.P.
3. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
WEST
GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
BHIMAVARAM.
4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, WEST
GODAVARI DISTRICT. BHIMAVARAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased issue a writ or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying the Crop insurance amount for the year 2020-2021 to the lands of the petitioners in Sy ~ 2 ~
No. 554/3 an extent of acr. 3.04 cents, R.S. No. 136 , acr. 7.12 cents, R.S. No.
554-4A acr.1.05 cents AND , R.S.No. 554-4B, acr.0.28 cents of Yandagandi village, Undi Mandal, West Godavari district. An amount of Rs.2,49,104.00 (
Two Lacks Forty nine thousand and one not four rupees only) respectively despite given undertaking as illegal arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21
of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to issue Crop insurance amount for the year 2020-2021 to me Sarva season to the lands of me. And pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NAGABATHULA SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE
~ 3 ~
WRIT PETITION NO: 1450 of 2023
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “....issue a writ or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not paying the Crop insurance amount for the year 2020-2021 to the lands of the petitioners in Sy.No. 554/3 an extent of Ac. 3.04 cents, R.S. No. 136 , Acr. 7.12 cents, R.S. No. 554-4A Acr.1.05 cents and , R.S.No. 554- 4B, Acr.0.28 cents of Yandagandi village, Undi Mandal, West Godavari district to an amount of Rs.2,49,104.00 ( Two Lakhs Forty nine thousand one hundred and four rupees only) respectively despite given an undertaking as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to issue Crop insurance amount for the year 2020- 2021 to me Sarva season to the lands of me…”
2. Heard Sri Nagabathula Srinivasa Rao, counsel for the petitioner and Ms. M. Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Food and Agriculture for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that during pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has substantially been redressed. He further submits that the balance amount claimed by the petitioner has been released by the respondents and the due amount payable to the petitioner has been paid. In view of the subsequent developments, learned counsel would submit that no further orders are required in the present writ petition.
~ 4 ~
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents does not dispute the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding release of the amount during the pendency of the writ petition.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the amount claimed in the writ petition has already been released and that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.06.2026. UPS
~ 5 ~
WRIT PETITION NO: 1450 of 2023
Dt.17.06.2026
UPS