Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8013/2026 of ANNAMREDDY NAGESWARA RAO Vs UNION OF INDIA on 16 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: 1. ANNAMREDDY NAGESWARA RAO, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O GOPALAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI
APHC010151712026
IN TH
WEDNESDA
TWO
THE HONOURA
W
Between:
1. ANNAMREDDY N
ABOUT 45 YEA
GODAVARI DISTR
008-086
2. TAMMIREDDY S
AGED ABOUT 45
MANDAL, EAST G
574, TB NO. 30-04
3. TAMMIREDDY MO
ABOUT MAJOR R
DISTRICT.- 53423
4. TALARI VENKATE
YEARS, R/O
DISTRICT.- 53423
5. TANETI VEERA R
GOPALAPURAM
TBGRNO. 17-008-
6. BOTCHA BANGA
GOPALAPURAM
TBGRNO. 17-08-4
7. GADDE SATYAV
CHITYALA VILLAG
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JU
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
RIT PETITION NO: 8013/2026
AGESWARA RAO, S/O SATYANARA
ARS R/O GOPALAPURAM MAN
RICT.- 534235 TBGR NO. 17-008-2
SEETHARAMIREDDY,, S/O VENK
5 YEARS, R/O RESIDENT OF GO
GODAVARI DISTRICT.- 534235 TBG
42-291
OHAN REDDY,, S/O SEETHARAMIR
R/O GOPALAPURAM MANDAL, EAS
35 TBGR NO. 17/008/571, TB NO. 30
ESWARA RAO,, S/O VENKANNA, AG
GOPALAPURAM MANDAL, EAST
35 TBGR NO. 17/008/357, TB NO. 17
RAGHAVULU,, S/O SOORAYYA, AGE
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST
-255, TBNO. 17-008-280
ARAYYA,, S/O PENTAYYA, AGE
MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST
VATI,, W/O DURGARAO, AGE M
GE, GOPALAPURAM MANDAL- 5342
RC,J
W.P.No.8013 of 2026
DESH
UNE
LAPATI
AYANA, AGED
NDAL, EAST
203, TN NOL7-
KATA REDDY,
OPALAPURAM
GR NO. 17-008-
REDDY, AGED
ST GODAVARI
0-007-087
GED ABOUT 60
T GODAVARI
7.008.274
E MAJOR R/O
RICT.- 534235
MAJOR R/O
RICT.- 534235
MAJOR R/O
235 TBGR NO.
RC,J
17-063-249
8. PALLOTU SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS
R/O
VEDULLAKUNTA
VILLAGE,
GOPALAPURAM
MANDAL.- 534235 TBGR NO. 17-021-076, TB NO. 17-021-073
9. BALLE RAMACHANDRA VARAPRASAD,, S/O RAJARAO, AGE
MAJOR R/O YADAVOLU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI MANDAL.- 534235 TBGR NO 30-057-214, TB NOS. 30-057-094, 30-057-095
10. TIRUPATI RAMA DURGARAO, , W/O CHANDRARAO, AGED
ABOUT 45 YEARS R/O YADAVOLU VILLAGE, DEVARAPALLI
MANDAL. EAST GODVARI DISTRICT - 534235
11. NAIDU SATYNARAYANA, S/O. PEDDA KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS, POTHAVARAM VILLAGE, NALLAJARLA,EAST GODVARI
DISTRICT 534235 TBGR NO. 30-042-459, TB NO. 30-043-090.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT ROOM
NO 501 VANIJYA BHAWAN NEW DELHI 110001
2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, TOBACCO BOARD, G.T. ROAD, GUNTUR - 522 004, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE TOBACCO BOARD, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, G.T. ROAD, GUNTUR-522 004, ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE
REGIONAL
MANAGER,
TOBACCO
BOARD,
RAJAHMUNDRY/ONGOLE REGION, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. THE
AUCTION
SUPERINTENDENT,
TOBACCO
BOARD,
GOPALAPURAM (BOARD-33). EAST GODAVAI DISTRICT -534235
6. THE
AUCTION
SUPERINTENDENT,
TOBACCO
BOARD,
DEVARAPALLI (BOARD-17). EAST GODAVARI - 534235
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be RC,J
pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus Declaring the action of the Respondents in insisting on the complete demolition or reduction of the wall heights of the Petitioners old barns under Clause 13(n) of the 2025-26 Circular, and not permitting them to merely dismantle the curing infrastructure, as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution of India consequently Direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioners to dysfunction their old bams under the previous 2024-25 rule leniency (i.e., by merely removing the furnace sets, flue pipes, and tier poles) so the Petitioners can utilize the remaining structures for tying cattle, storing fodder, and safeguarding agricultural implements and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased leased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider and dispose of the representation dated 06-03-2026 along with representations of petitioners and puchasers for approval of the sale/transfer of tobacco licenses and for permission to make the old barns dysfunctional (instead of complete demolition or reduction of wall heights), and further direct the Respondents, their men, agents, and subordinates not to take any coercive steps-including the forced demolition or reduction of the wall heights-against the Petitioners'
existing barn structures situated under the jurisdiction of 5th and 6th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.M DHANA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL)
The Court made the following:
RC,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri M.Dhanaraju, learned counsel for the petitioners, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
In view of the above this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 17.06.2026.
RR