Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16435/2024 of B PRASANNA LAKSHMI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16435/2024 Between: 1. B PRASANNA LAKSHMI, W/O RAMESH, AGED 33 YEARS,
APHC010324692024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16435/2024
Between:
1. B PRASANNA LAKSHMI, W/O RAMESH, AGED 33 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, R/O.
D.NO.4-102,
ARTHAMURU
VILLAGE,
BANTUMILLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
3. THE
COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR
OF
AGRICULTURE,
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, OLD MIRCHI YARD, NALLAPADU ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
MARKETING, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, (NTR DISTRICT).
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things and deeds
of Respondents in not paying the contract bill amount to the Petitioner i.e., Rs. 18,60,330/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakhs Sixty Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Only) in respect of the work for Providing C.C Approach to Existing godowns at Market yard, Pedana under Agriculture Market Committee, Pedana in Krishna District, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against to the Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents to pay the total SDF part contract bill amount of Rs. 18,60,330/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakhs Sixty Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Only)
along with interest for the works carried by the Petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE
2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
WRIT PETITION NO: 16435 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “....to issue an appropriate Writ or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things and deeds of Respondents in not paying the contract bill amount to the Petitioner i.e., Rs. 18,60,330/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakhs Sixty Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Only) in respect of the work for Providing C.C Approach to existing godowns at Market yard, Pedana under Agriculture Market Committee, Pedana in Krishna District, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against to the Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents to pay the total SDF part contract bill amount of Rs. 18,60,330/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakhs Sixty Thousand Three Hundred and Thirty Only) along with interest for the works carried by the Petitioner..”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has received the due amount payable to the petitioner and the petition may be disposed of, since no further orders are required in this matter.
3. Ms. M. Sandhya Deepthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture for the respondents is in attendance and would submit that recording the same, the petition maybe disposed of.
4. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.06.2026. UPS
WRIT PETITION NO: 16435 of 2024
Dt.16.06.2026
UPS