Andhra Pradesh High Court
FCA/69/2008 of KANDREGULA GOPALAKRISHNA Vs KANDREGULA PARVATHI ALIAS DADI PARVATHI on 15 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 69/2008 Between: 1. KANDREGULA GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O. LATE SATYANARAYANA, EMPLOYEE IN TELECOM DEPARTMENT, R/O. GAVARAPALEM,
APHC010585182008
IN THE
TUESDAY
TWO T
THE HONO
THE HONOURA
FAMILY C
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KANDREGULA SATYANARAYAN R/O. GAVARAP DISTRICT.
1. KANDREGULA Gopalakrishhna, Madhura Nagar,
Appeal under sec IA NO: 1 OF 2005(FCA Petition under Se stated in the affidavit fi be pleased condone Appeal against the De of the Family Court Visakhapatnam dated HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT OURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH ABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMAL COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 69/2008 GOPALAKRISHNA, S/O. NA, EMPLOYEE IN TELECOM DEPAR PALEM, ANANKAPALLE, VISAKHAP ...APPE AND PARVATHI ALIAS DADI PARVATH C/o. D. Krishna Murthy, R/o. Plot ...RESPO ction________ against orders AMP 325 OF 2005 ction 151 CPC praying that in the circum led in support of the petition, the High C 31 days of delay in presenting Fam ecree and order in OP.no.295 of 2001 o cum IV Addl. District and Sessions 8-12-04 H
LLI LATE RTMENT, PATNAM ELLANT HI, W/o. No. 54, ONDENT mstances Court may mily Court on the file s Judge,
Counsel for the Appellant: 1.- Counsel for the Respondent:
1. V S R ANJANEYALU The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 69/2008 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
The present Family Court Appeal has been preferred challenging the judgment and decree dated 08.12.2004 passed by the learned Family Court-cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, in O.P. No. 295 of 2001.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.
3. A perusal of the docket order dated 04.05.2020 discloses that Registry had sent notice to the appellant and the same was returned with an endorsement that the appellant had ‘died’. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
___________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 16.06.2026 TJN
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 69/2008
16.06.2026 TJN