Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/14316/2026 of Thippireddy Chandra Sekhar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 15 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 14316/2026 Between: Thippireddy Chandra Sekhar ...PETITIONER AND The

APHC010270242026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 14316/2026

Between:

Thippireddy Chandra Sekhar

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petitioner:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PAVULURI SREENIVASULU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following:

Writ Petition No:14316 /2026 O R DE R:

The Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondent for not considering the representations of the Petitioner dated 16.08.2024 and 21.08.2024 for re-appointment of the Petitioner as Shift Operator in the respondent Corporation.

2. The Petitioner was appointed as a Shift Operator in APSPDCL at the Kethigunta Sub Station in the year 2010 on a contract basis. While so, on account of an incident which led to the death of a Junior Lineman by the name of Dasari Venkateswarlu on 08.10.2022 while doing work on an electrical pole after receiving a complaint, a criminal case was registered vide F.I.R. No. 103/2022 against the Petitioner. Subsequently, a Charge Sheet was also filed for the offences punishable under Section 304 Part-II of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(va) of the SCs and STs (POA) Amendment Act, 2015. On account of the involvement of the Petitioner in the criminal case, the respondent authorities terminated the services of the Petitioner from 08.10.2022.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the allegations against the Petitioner are yet to be established in a criminal Court and the Petitioner could not have been terminated on mere allegations.

4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for APSPDCL would submit that the order of termination was passed in the year 2022 and there was a substitute appointment in the place where the Petitioner. He further submits that the representations of the Petitioner would be considered subject to availability of posts.

5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions:

i) The Respondent-authorities are directed to consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 16.08.2024 and 21.08.2024 for re-appointment of the Petitioner as Shift Operator as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three

(03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order.

ii) There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

Date: 16.06.2026

eha

W.P.No.14316 of 2026 Dated: 16.06.2026

eha

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead