Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/412/2010 of KONDETI NAMO SRINIVAS RAO, W.G.DISTRICT Vs SMT. KONDENTI BHU LAKSHMI, W.G.DISTRICT on 15 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 412/2010 Between:
APHC010412602010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 412/2010
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KONDETI NAMO SRINIVAS RAO, W.G.DISTRICT, S/O SURYANARAYANA CYCLE MECHANIC PALAKOL, P.J.C.J.C., W.G.DISTRICT
...APPELLANT AND
1. SMT KONDENTI BHU LAKSHMI W G DISTRICT, W/o Namo Srinivas Private Employee H/o Meka Leela Krishna D.No. 33-3-16, 17th Ward, Achigantlapalem, P.J.C.J.C., W.G. District
...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders Counsel for the Appellant:
1. P DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent:
1. CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 412/2010 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the order and decree dated 29.10.2010 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narsapur, West Godavari District, in H.M.O.P. No.73 of 2007.
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that, despite his efforts, he could not secure any instructions from the appellant in this appeal of the year 2010 and is therefore unable to prosecute the matter.
3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant and as no instructions have been received from the appellant for a long time, this Court is satisfied that the appellant is not inclined to pursue the matter further.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to file an appropriate application seeking revival/restoration of the appeal, if any instructions are received subsequently. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
_________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
Date: 16.06.2026 klk
C.M.A.No.412 of 2010
Dated: 16.06.2026
klk