FCA/20/2007 of M. RADHIKA Vs M. RAMAKRISHNAIAH & ANR on 15 June 2026

1. M. RADHIKA, W/O. M. RAMAKRISHNAIAH HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.20-1-470/C,13, MARUTHINAGAR, KORLAGUNTA, TIRUPATHI.

...APPELLANT AND

1. M RAMAKRISHNAIAH ANR, S/O. M. OBAIAH JUNIOR TELECOM OFFICER OFC STATION, TELEPHONE EXCHANGE, RENIGUNTA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. P SUBRAHMANYAM NAIDU, TELECOM OPERATOR R/O.D.NO.2-21, TELECOM COLONY, TIRUPATHI.

...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section________ against orders

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 13 days in filing the present FCA.

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the order and decree in H.M.O.P.No.51 of 2002 on the file of the Hon'ble Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Family Court-cum-V ADJ., Tirupathi dated 28.6.2006. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(FCAMP 37 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all proceedings in HMOP.NO.51 of 2002 on the file of the Hon'ble Judge, Family Court cum V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi, dated 28-6-06 pending disposal of the FCA IA NO: 1 OF 2008(XOBJ 28792 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:

1. L RAVICHANDER Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. A CHANDRAIH NAIDU The Court made the following:

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 20/2007 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh)

1. This Appeal is filed challenging the order and decree dated 28.06.2006 passed in H.M.O.P. No.51 of 2002 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that, despite his efforts, he could not secure any instructions from the appellant in this appeal of the year 2007 and is therefore unable to prosecute the matter.

3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant and as no instructions have been received from the appellant for a long time, this Court is satisfied that the appellant is not inclined to pursue the matter further.

4. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the appellant to file an appropriate application seeking revival/restoration of the appeal, if any instructions are received subsequently. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH

_________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

Date: 16.06.2026 klk

F.C.A.No.20 of 2007

Dated: 16.06.2026

klk