Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30717/2025 of V.Padmavathi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 14 June 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30717 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-39 [3579] V.Padmavathi, ...Petitioner Vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Regulagadda Venkatesh representing Mr. Subramanyam Daraboina Advocate(s)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010595352025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 30717 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-39
V.Padmavathi, ...Petitioner Vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. Regulagadda Venkatesh representing Mr. Subramanyam Daraboina Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. P. Somaraju, Asst. Govt. Pleader – R1 Mrs. T.V.Sridevi,Standing Counsel For Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences
– R2 Mr. G. Sai Narayana Rao, SC For SAAP – R3
CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA DATE : 15th June 2026 LISA GILL, CJ: Grievance raised in this writ petition was that petitioner was being denied consideration for admission in M.B.B.S. course under sports category on the ground that she had participated in the events in question representing the State of West Bengal and not the State of Andhra Pradesh.
2. It is case of petitioner that she is otherwise eligible and had played the sport of fencing at national level and that she is a local candidate belonging to
HCJ & NJS, J W.P. No: 30717 of 2025
the State of Andhra Pradesh. Petitioner had, however, participated in the events representing State of West Bengal at that time because her father was posted there during the relevant period.
3. Vide order dated 05.11.2025, passed in this writ petition, it was directed that candidature of petitioner be considered for admission under sports category notwithstanding the fact that she had participated in the events in question representing the State of West Bengal. In compliance thereto, petitioner’s case was considered and she was granted admission as well. It is informed that petitioner is continuing with the course in question.
4. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 further informs that sports certificates relied upon by petitioner, reflecting her participation in the events in question, have been verified and have been found to be genuine. It is further not denied that petitioner has a domicile of Andhra Pradesh.
5. Keeping in view peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, proceedings in this writ petition are closed while observing that the same may not be treated as a precedent. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
LISA GILL, CJ
NINALA JAYASURYA, J
akn
HCJ & NJS, J W.P. No: 30717 of 2025
HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Writ Petition No: 30717 of 2025 DATE: 15.06.2026
AKN